Thala_0710
International Captain
Not really, noThat is, indeed, extremely outlandish.
Not really, noThat is, indeed, extremely outlandish.
They have Chanders over Gooch as well btw2024 Ranking of Batsmen Poll
As long as we get 10 or more voters we will continue. 12 voters this round and 14 nominations. 12 - McCabe, Lawry; 8 - Pietersen, Cowdrey; 6 - Gower; 5 - Hazare; 4 - MaCartney, Morris, Yousuf; 3 - Paynter; 2 - Hassett, Donnelly; 1 - Ponsford, Ranjitsinhji. McCabe and Lawry share 55th spot by...www.cricketweb.net
Even on CW, Worrell ranked 3-4 spots higher than Kanhai in the 2024 poll
I mean, you're allowed to have whatever opinion you want, I'm not Vladmir Johan to suppress that, but Yeah I don't hold Kanhai in the same class as those two, whom I have in Barrington tier.Not really, no
I have all 3 below that tierI mean, you're allowed to have whatever opinion you want, I'm not Vladmir Johan to suppress that, but Yeah I don't hold Kanhai in the same class as those two, whom I have in Barrington tier.
it's not me pretending your opinion is outlandishThey have Chanders over Gooch as well btw
I will have Miller above broad, philander, botham, Gillespie, hazlewood, larwood, willis shoaib quite easily. Miller as a bowler in general is very underrated in cricket circleI’d say Miller over Roberts would be a pretty minority opinion here and Roberts is at the bottom so that makes sense
I mean, okay, you'll find Weekes and Walcott are generally rated in the Barrington tier thoughI have all 3 below that tier
Miller's relatively low WPM in both test and FC cricket is an issue I feel as to why he doesn't get rated higherI will have Miller above broad, philander, botham, Gillespie, hazlewood, larwood, willis shoaib quite easily. Miller as a bowler in general is very underrated in cricket circle
How do you decide quality though. Is Miller definitely better on quality than a Hazlewood or Gillespie?Wpm is problem against bowlers who average sub 23 and are equal/better on quality, not those who are neither qualitatively better and nor have close averages.
YesHow do you decide quality though. Is Miller definitely better on quality than a Hazlewood or Gillespie?
I would say so too, but how do you conclude that
Miller's away record is well better than Haze, Philander is not 1/10 of Miller on flat pitches, he's a condition specialistI would say so too, but how do you conclude that
Why is slip fielding not a secondary skill? These are the semantics I was speaking of when some claimed I was making it up.Fielding is a tertiary skill.
It is not even a secondary skill.
If we are picking cricketers based on secondary and tertiary skill; then Jacques Kallis should be picked ahead of Sachin Tendulkar or Viv Richards.
Come off it, dude.It's very much a specialist position, even if a neglected, and here, disparaged one.
Really?Players have been selected purely for their ability to field in the cordon.
Teams pick their players based on specialists skills and fielders find themselves in these positions over time.Really?
Hadlee at 16 arguably isWho even allows such stuff to get published, where Bumrah at 1 and Hadlee at 16 aren't even the biggest howlers
No HADLEE and Gavaskar.No Muralitharan.