• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Scott Boland vs Ollie Robinson

Who is the better test bowler?


  • Total voters
    17

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I don’t know what your problem is but you’ve been completely out of it this thread, mate.
 

Gob

International Coach
Might sound controversial but Boland is a better bowler than Anderson skill wise despite having a far worse career. Robbo who the **** was that
 

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I mean, if Jomel Warrican and Rohit Sharma can have international careers, surely he can too.
One's a spinner and one's a batsman. Ollie needs to actually run in and do something over after over all day, not like the other two grifters who have somehow managed to become paid cricketers. We all know spin bowling is what you do if you want to become a bowler, but you don't have the physical attributes for it, and batsmen like Rohit trade their ability to hit boundaries for the hundreds of runs they cost their team due to the fact they can't keep their pudgy little hands out of the team cookie jar.

Ollie has put his hand up to be a member of the fast bowler's club, and his application has been rejected on the grounds that he bowls at an embarrassing speed for a tall man, has a rig like a bloated corpse, and possesses the stamina of an emphysemic couch potato. And that's just in bed.
 

Top