• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Saeed Anwar vs Mahela Jayawardene

Who is the better test batsman?


  • Total voters
    19

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Anwar is a better quality bat than any opener in the SC besides Gavaskar. However, I would put Sehwag ahead of Anwar based on career length and output but not Jaya.
 

Migara

International Coach
Two players that were terrific in tough conditions
Nope. Anwar was not good in tough conditions. He was good on flat tracks and on tracks that helped spin or pace to a moderate degree.

Mahela was poor against moving ball, beast on flat tracks, but his specialty was playing well on paddy field like pitches, and he was one of the ATGs in that. The way he batted would have been an excellent player on sticky wickets too.

Both had aesthetics. Anwar had the raw power too.

Marginally Anwar.
 

ma1978

International Regular
lol @ Anwar being compared to Mahela (or Sehwag for that matter). Anwar had a short decent test career.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Anwar qualitatively the greater Batsmen, Jaya quantitively the better batsmen.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Vijay Merchant was better than Anwar. Played English swing well.
Debatable. Anwar has some quality performances against McGrath, a very good away series against Donald/Pollock, good performances in NZ and Eng and was rated very very highly by Aussies of the era. He was one of the best players of spin too.
 

Cricket Bliss

State 12th Man
Debatable. Anwar has some quality performances against McGrath, a very good away series against Donald/Pollock, good performances in NZ and Eng and was rated very very highly by Aussies of the era. He was one of the best players of spin too.
Indian's were in their initial stage. Lack of experience against English swing. Even scored a 100 against Bedser in 1946. Longevity of 18 years
 
Last edited:

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Indian's were in their initial stage. Lack of experience against English swing. Even scored a 100 against Bedser at the age of 34. Longevity of 18 years
The same Bedser who was debuting and proceeded to dominated by Australia and South Africa until the 50/51 Ashes?
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Indian's were in their initial stage. Lack of experience against English swing. Even scored a 100 against Bedser at the age of 34. Longevity of 18 years
Anwar played top pacers and spinners home and away at their peak as opener in the mid late 90s.
 

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Bedser picked 7. Also scored a 100 against Statham at age 40, although in India.
I know. All I’m saying is Bedser wasn’t really that good at that point in his career. The rest of India was just really poor batting wise. Plus it was a pretty dead pitch apparently. And he took 2/60 in that innings, not 7. When he got 7 Merchant had already been bowled for a duck by another bowler.
 

Top