Mate there is a very simple metric of how many Man of the Match and Series performances Murali put up. Bowlers are match winners and he was easily a more consistent match winner than Warne. And of course we can do the stats dance but the point is the basic objective metrics all favor Murali. If you wanna put filters and caveats, be my guest but my point obviously is still true - the objective metrics of bowling average, strike rate, wickets per match show Murali is clearly better. The moment you bring in filters and caveats, they are no longer strictly objective. So thanks for proving me right, again.
And I am not thinking I am fair or even handed. I am just telling my preference, unlike you, who is just so blinded by bias that you cannot see facts.
Once again, objective as in the basic stats. I did leave the room open coz if you want to take a subjective approach, it just depends on your criterion and bias.