Precisely no one did it before so it was effective. It was a one-off thing, which worked positively in the end.1. I don't particularly care how it is remembered in India, Being given a bad decision is no reason to almost forfeit a test match, If it were almost every Test match in New Zealand, Asia and West Indies should have been threatened by forfeit before neutral umpiring. Also, Sachin didn't react that way in 1999, neither did Imran in West Indies in 1988 (I think), so No, nobody had issues with Gavaskar before he decided to make issues with Australia for his personal reaction toward a bad decision.
2. No, you're welcome to explain though
I mentioned him because:If Hutton did the same, I would say he's picking the fight too by the way, no point mentioning him.
You may not, I don't either, I've been in my fair share of fights, it doesn't mean anything to me, Gavaskar had a bad reaction to something that was wrong, hell he didn't react far differently from how I would've. Wolverine said Australians and English had a problem with Gavaskar, I'm just informing they didn't, Gavaskar had a problem with the Australians, and that's fine, I like people having problems with the Australians but let's not rewrite history here.I mentioned him because:
A) You mentioned 50s Ashes
B) He was a Great Opener, not too dissimilar as a player to Gavaskar himself
It wasn't because you like Hutton, I genuinely don't mind such a one off thing.
I actually think the English kinda liked him, despite his record being relatively weakest there. Really goes to show pundits many a times rates on ceiling. Australians don't think particularly liked him, but he liked them even less so meh.You may not, I don't either, I've been in my fair share of fights, it doesn't mean anything to me, Gavaskar had a bad reaction to something that was wrong, hell he didn't react far differently from how I would've. Wolverine said Australians and English had a problem with Gavaskar, I'm just informing they didn't, Gavaskar had a problem with the Australians, and that's fine, I like people having problems with the Australians but let's not rewrite history here.
Gavaskar's comments on Shane Warne and David Hooke's death bordered on completely insensitive to borderline racist for the latter, They have no obligation to like him in today's time, if they do then that's quite shameful. Back then, I guess it was the Boycott syndrome.I actually think the English kinda liked him, despite his record being relatively weakest there. Really goes to show pundits many a times rates on ceiling. Australians don't think particularly liked him, but he liked them even less so meh.
Sunny has some kind hatred on english and aussie players but shamlessly licks ass of pakistani players. Imran once made raciast comment on indians in front of sunny but he was silent. If same was done was aussie or englishmen sunny would have been calling them racistGavaskar's comments on Shane Warne and David Hooke's death bordered on completely insensitive to borderline racist for the latter, They have no obligation to like him in today's time, if they do then that's quite shameful. Back then, I guess it was the Boycott syndrome.
It's obviously about skin colour.Sunny has some kind hatred on english and aussie players but shamlessly licks ass of pakistani players. Imran once made raciast comment on indians in front of sunny but he was silent. If same was done was aussie or englishmen sunny would have been calling them racist
Once boycott said on indian television that if india wants better relations with pakistan they should send sunny as ambassador considering his bais towards themIt's obviously about skin colour.
Don’t even think most Indians are really massive fans of him tbh.I think iam only indian who hates sunny for being baised insensitive and for his agenda against some indian players
Right many younger generation hate him. You might not believe but many post 2000 born indians hate bcci for being greedy ****ers they areDon’t even think most Indians are really fans of him tbh.
It’s just his batting that most rate very high
Generation differenceDon’t even think most Indians are really massive fans of him tbh.
It’s just his batting that most rate very high
You might not believe but many post 2000 born indians hate bcci for being greedy ****ers they are
dude averaged 59 over c160 tests, the teen years irate irrelevantarguably without the teen wonder years he loses a lot of his charm
sure? but it contributes to his insane longevity which is his strongest point.dude averaged 59 over c160 tests, the teen years irate irrelevant
the longevity isn’t his strongest point, it’s the insane consistency for 160 testssure? but it contributes to his insane longevity which is his strongest point.