• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Peak steve smith vs peak tendulkar

Who had better peak

  • Tendulkar -96-03

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Smith-14-21

    Votes: 24 96.0%

  • Total voters
    25

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
That glamour factor of scoring runs against Warne fades when you have likes of Kambli and Sidhu tonking him as if it's backyard cricket game. The same batsmen would struggle against ball bouncing slightly higher from someone like Franklyn Rose.
You do realise, some batsmen are better vs spin than pace, and vice versa?
 

Sliferxxxx

State Vice-Captain
I rate him the best bat of the era and 6/7 in my all time list.

Yes he was exceptional in his skills and that doesn't contradict having some of the easiest home conditions which inflated his peak average.
The man made runs all over the world. Please stop this crap about inflated home averages. At his peak, Smith made runs in India, NZ, England and RSA etc
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The man made runs all over the world. Please stop this crap about inflated home averages. At his peak, Smith made runs in India, NZ, England and RSA etc
Wow he scored runs away too?! OMG, I never heard that before!

Are you programmed to take offense at everything I say?

He had pancakes at home and he was an ATG bat in one of the best peaks ever and he filled his pockets.
 

Sliferxxxx

State Vice-Captain
Wow he scored runs away too?! OMG, I never heard that before!

Are you programmed to take offense at everything I say?

He had pancakes at home and he was an ATG bat in one of the best peaks ever and he filled his pockets.
Umm no. I usually try to steer clear of your diatribe but A. You're usually the one jumping all over me and a certain other whenever we post and B. you keep spewing the same stuff over and over and over and over again and someone has to call you out on your tiresome pov.
 

DrWolverine

International Regular
It’s because of the numbers
An average just above 50
Just 24 centuries and record skewed by one year

TBH Viv Richards is underrated as a test batsman and it becomes even more impressive if you take into consideration his strike rate.
 

Johan

International Coach
It’s because of the numbers
An average just above 50
Just 24 centuries and record skewed by one year

TBH Viv Richards is underrated as a test batsman and it becomes even more impressive if you take into consideration his strike rate.
It's just dismantling the status quo behind your favourite era, notice how most of the Viv detractors have preference for 90s and 2000s? this is a process you can see happening with older players too, with how hostile some Modern day player fanbases are to Sachin/McGrath/Lara, 20 years from now, you'd be reading about how Brian Lara was an overrated test batsmen and how Root or Kallis are better because someone decided Lara's numbers don't match his reputation.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
It's just dismantling the status quo behind your favourite era, notice how most of the Viv detractors have preference for 90s and 2000s? this is a process you can see happening with older players too, with how hostile some Modern day player fanbases are to Sachin/McGrath/Lara, 20 years from now, you'd be reading about how Brian Lara was an overrated test batsmen and how Root or Kallis are better because someone decided Lara's numbers don't match his reputation.
I have not noticed
 

DrWolverine

International Regular
20 years from now, you'd be reading about how Brian Lara was an overrated test batsmen and how Root or Kallis are better because someone decided Lara's numbers don't match his reputation.
I have already seen about how Kallis > Lara in some places
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Umm no. I usually try to steer clear of your diatribe but A. You're usually the one jumping all over me and a certain other whenever we post and B. you keep spewing the same stuff over and over and over and over again and someone has to call you out on your tiresome pov.
You are almost always the one initiating contact to Tut Tut and scold me.

Anyways, please learn to engage with actual points with counterpoints for better dialogue.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It's just dismantling the status quo behind your favourite era, notice how most of the Viv detractors have preference for 90s and 2000s? this is a process you can see happening with older players too, with how hostile some Modern day player fanbases are to Sachin/McGrath/Lara, 20 years from now, you'd be reading about how Brian Lara was an overrated test batsmen and how Root or Kallis are better because someone decided Lara's numbers don't match his reputation.
Unfortunately Kallis overreacting has sunk deep. As I point out, nobody rated him as high as they do now during his actual career.

Lara is definitely liable to be kicked out of the top ten bats too in the future.
 

vidiq

State Regular
[
It's just dismantling the status quo behind your favourite era, notice how most of the Viv detractors have preference for 90s and 2000s? this is a process you can see happening with older players too, with how hostile some Modern day player fanbases are to Sachin/McGrath/Lara, 20 years from now, you'd be reading about how Brian Lara was an overrated test batsmen and how Root or Kallis are better because someone decided Lara's numbers don't match his reputation.
:(:schmoll:
 

DrWolverine

International Regular
At least Lara has his 375 & 400
Plus his fourth innings classics against the Aussies
I am more worried that Viv will be kicked out of Top 10
 

Top