• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Odd action

Tomm NCCC

International 12th Man
I think you must mean Kim Barnett who played for Derbyshire and England, had a strange looking stance
Peter Willey had a very front on stance at the crease when batting
Insert Derby Joke # 72

Micheal Yardy certainly has an odd stance.
 

FRAZ

International Captain
Think Peter Willey used to face the square leg umpire and Derek Randell had a strange stance to match his strange personality
Best post ever . Graphics are just amazing .. But I am afraid if once it's gonna become a fashion then won't stimulate at all . once in a while thingi gives a sweet itch to my eyes . But yeah but what were you saying ?
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
Best post ever . Graphics are just amazing .. But I am afraid if once it's gonna become a fashion then won't stimulate at all . once in a while thingi gives a sweet itch to my eyes . But yeah but what were you saying ?
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 

open365

International Vice-Captain
Mitchel Johnson. I cannot help but stare at the way he keeps his delivery arm completely still as he's running in and goes into his action.


I remember watching a West Indian bowler - I think a batsman who bowled part time - who would walk into the crease, sort of shuffle/skid his feet on the crease and bowl. That was when I was about 5, I think.
Yeh i noticed that about Johnson to, i kept thinking if frogs could bowl, they'd bowl like he does but then i got used to watching him.

His action even though it looks strange at first is acctualy brilliant.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
That he has an odd action. What's yours?
That you were suggesting it was an illegal action, when IMO it's nothing OTS, it's just an unavoidable hyperextension due to an unchangeable double-joint.

Just like Brian Statham and a multitude of others (Shoaib Akhtar for instance).
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Just because Statham was a great bowler doesn't mean he was very close to chucking it.
Greatness means nothing - Statham is just the best bowler of the many who've been double-jointed. So I picked him.

Double-jointed doesn't mean you chuck it. Hyper-extension cannot be helped. It's not a straightening, it's a un-straightening.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
That you were suggesting it was an illegal action, when IMO it's nothing OTS, it's just an unavoidable hyperextension due to an unchangeable double-joint.

Just like Brian Statham and a multitude of others (Shoaib Akhtar for instance).
Fair enough, I mean it's not like Kirtley's ever been reported for chucking or anything, is it?

Oh, wait...
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Who's to say Statham wouldn't have been had he lived in this ever-scrutinous age.

Murali's been reported for chucking, too - what's your point? Kirtley has been checked and time-and-again it's been found his arm is hyper-extending which he cannot help...
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Who's to say Statham wouldn't have been had he lived in this ever-scrutinous age.

Murali's been reported for chucking, too - what's your point? Kirtley has been checked and time-and-again it's been found his arm is hyper-extending which he cannot help...
& it was found he chucked his doosra until he undertook remedial action on it. I personally think he still does throw that particular delivery in match conditions. I really don't wan to go down that route tho, no good can possibly come of it.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
It was found such until the rules were changed when it was found they were based on false ideals.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
It was found such until the rules were changed when it was found they were based on false ideals.
No, the flexion in his elbow for his doosra was over the fifteen degree tolerance that we have currently, so he chucked it according to the shiny new (and terrible, compromised & unenforceable) law.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Agree about the terribleness and unenforceableness of the new law but I'd never read about Murali's Wrong-'Un being more than 14deg... :huh:
 

Top