MasterBlaster24
U19 Debutant
Better cricketer?
Proctor.
This still unreasonably pisses me off everytime I see it.Pollock the better Test Cricket while Proctor the better Cricketer.
Get the E out.This still unreasonably pisses me off everytime I see it.
Tbf to Shaun. 108 (109?) of his 186 FC games were test matches.But yes as others have said, if we’re talking tests, Pollock obviously. If we’re talking FC, Procter obviously.
Fun stat: Procter scored the same amount of centuries in 6 consecutive innings as Pollock did in his entire FC career.
And we pick tests obviously.But yes as others have said, if we’re talking tests, Pollock obviously. If we’re talking FC, Procter obviously.
Fun stat: Procter scored the same amount of centuries in 6 consecutive innings as Pollock did in his entire FC career.
I mean, its pointless to make a thread comparing the two in tests. There’s no comparison.And we pick tests obviously.
....... ODIs?But yes as others have said, if we’re talking tests, Pollock obviously. If we’re talking FC, Procter obviously.
Fun stat: Procter scored the same amount of centuries in 6 consecutive innings as Pollock did in his entire FC career.
Think what it is that Procter was a better cricketer, while Pollock had a better career.Pollock the better Test Cricket while Proctor the better Cricketer.
How many ODIs did Procter play?....... ODIs?
Exactly. Pollock is a better ODI player.How many ODIs did Procter play?
Confirmed, Bond is only NZ’s 3rd best ODI bowler.Shaun Pollock was a one day cricket legend.
He was almost impossible to score runs against.
And a very useful lower order batsman as well.
View attachment 47641
Richard Hadlee I can understand.Confirmed, Bond is only NZ’s 3rd best ODI bowler.
Ofcourse not Hadlee. They are Chris Harris and Daniel VettoriRichard Hadlee I can understand.
Only 3rd best? Who is the other one?
I hope this isn’t a joke.They are Chris Harris and Daniel Vettori