Michael vaughan or ICC ?

[Deja moo]

Which is better ? I know people say ICCs better, but my understanding is that there are limited number of teams in ICC whereas MV has all the teams on the planet represented.

 

[Dasa]

I've played only a bit of MV, but the interface looks cumbersome and not as streamlined. I prefer ICC.

 

[Blaze]

I have both and ICC is 100 times better. MVCM is too easy and not very realistic

 

[Monty]

vaughan is unrealistic and slow

 

[Shoaib]

ICC is 1000 times better because MV is very unrealistic and slow

 

[sledger]

ICC also has highlights and stuff, very addictive actually.

 

[Kweek]

ICC is 1000 times better because MV is very unrealistic and slow

if mv is something not it is slow!

 

[Shoaib]

ICC also has highlights and stuff, very addictive actually.

I agree.I think I've become an ICC addict as I cannot sleep properly without playing it atleast for half an hour every night.And I'm expecting ICC 2005 to be more addictive than the previous versions.

 

[Deja moo]

The thinking in the other thread is that ICC2005 will merely be a database update, released to cash in on Ashes fever.

 

[marc71178]

It's going to have to be more than just a DB update (because the DB structure was kind of released, and the work done here with updated DBs would make their work fairly useless)

 

[Gilchrist]

havent played the other game yet so I cannot say will soon get Michael Vaughan CC

 

[Kweek]

i'd say wait a few months for the newer version.(now under the name Cricket Coach)

 

[Gilchrist]

thanks you know where i can get it from?,

 

[Gilchrist]

and when will it come out?

 

[dobbo2k4]

i have both and have to say that ICC is so much better in so many ways. Is a lot more fun to play and a lot more realistic. Get the new one from www.play.com though only £15. Great deal for a top quality game. MV is so much more unrealistic, you can get a team full of oversees players?