please, he has his first two double hundreds in less number of tests than bradman, the comparison should be agarwal vs bradman.Mayank Agarwal vs. Steve Smith please.
Great points.Some hard cold facts.
1. Mayank has a double century every 4 tests. Bradman only had one every 4.33 tests.
2. Mayank has played test cricket in more countries than Bradman.
3. Mayank has hit more sixes in a single test match day than Bradman did his whole career.
4. Mayank never got dropped after his debut. Bradman got dropped right in his first series.
5. Mayank has a better home average than Bradman.
6. Mayank has a better average than Bradman in Sydney.
No no, he's the one who was flown in for last two tests at MCG and SCG. You may recall him from the patient but firm reaming he administered on the assorted ball tampering cheats of Australia, helping secure a memorable series win.Is he the young kid who rolled his ankle out here before the tests last summer then got done as a drug cheat, or was that some other Indian prodigy?
That’s the kid I was thinking of.Shaw on steroids would have been interesting last summer down under. Would have widened the margin of victory considering we played ****s instead of him the first few test matches.
Lol the reason the series was won was because the assorted ball tamperers from Australia *weren’t* playing.No no, he's the one who was flown in for last two tests at MCG and SCG. You may recall him from the patient but firm reaming he administered on the assorted ball tampering cheats of Australia, helping secure a memorable series win.
Lol, it's sweet you believe Starc, cummins, and hazelwood were not in on the nasty little racket run by slimeball Smith.Lol the reason the series was won was because the assorted ball tamperers from Australia *weren’t* playing.
Will get an answer earlier than that, late next year.Looking forward to seeing how this is dealt with by the online plods in 2022 or so