Well I guess we are not all perfect then.tooextracool said:why on earth not? if the WI selectors back in the 80s had not picked marshall and picked any of the bowlers on the bench, i still wouldnt be surprised if they had a similar amount of success, because the quality of players playing domestic cricket was extremely high. fact is that with the standard of australian domestic cricket and the coaching, almost anyone who is successful in domestic cricket, invariably ends up being successful in tests. what i cant stand is that australian selectors manage to pick the ones that are so obviously not going to be successful in test cricket over ones that are so obviously are.
Kasprowicz aside, like who else?tooextracool said:did it not occur to you that there were far better options, and bracken never ever ever looked like being test class? the selection of bracken was understandable because, he at least looked capable, but the non selection of kasparowicz for that series and for god knows how long before that despite his consistent performances is simply ludicrous.
so your telling me that theres isnt a better bowler than bracken in all of australian domestic cricket?Craig said:Kasprowicz aside, like who else?
That's being a bit kind to Peter McIntyre, Shaun Young & Paul Wilson.age_master said:williams is the worst bolwer to play for test cricket for Australia ever (than hauritz came along....)
Try answering my question buddy.tooextracool said:so your telling me that theres isnt a better bowler than bracken in all of australian domestic cricket?
if thats the case, then thats really quite sad indeed.
Don't forget Scott Muller he would have to be the worst in recent times. Atleast the other three had half decent FC recordsMister Wright said:That's being a bit kind to Peter McIntyre, Shaun Young & Paul Wilson.
Scott Muller had a very good FC record & performed well in his two tests. His performances have been overshadowed by Warne's low act.chaminda_00 said:Don't forget Scott Muller he would have to be the worst in recent times. Atleast the other three had half decent FC records
He retired when he was made 12th man for Queensland during the 1997 (I think) shield final where we beat W.A. in Perth.vic_orthdox said:i read somewhere that muller retired from first class cricket, then made a comeback and it was after this that he made his test debut. and then went on to disappear back into obscurity. is that right?
and i reckon he has copped a raw deal, he didn't do too much wrong in his match/es for aus.
Hey man, don't knock Blocker. He was injured after bowling about 10 overs in his Test debut, remember? He was a very decent ODI bowler for a couple of seasons.That's being a bit kind to Peter McIntyre, Shaun Young & Paul Wilson.
Except it wasn't Warne who said it...Mister Wright said:Scott Muller had a very good FC record & performed well in his two tests. His performances have been overshadowed by Warne's low act.
So Paul Wilson didn't deserve his selection?Mister Wright said:That's being a bit kind to Peter McIntyre, Shaun Young & Paul Wilson.
Yes it was.FaaipDeOiad said:Except it wasn't Warne who said it...
no hes not, he was poor yes, but he certainly wasnt anywhere close to being the worst.age_master said:williams is the worst bolwer to play for test cricket for Australia ever (than hauritz came along....)
i would come up with specific names, had i been watching aussie domestic cricket. but im fairly sure that they are better bowlers than bracken in the domestic cricket of any test playing country.Craig said:Try answering my question buddy.
Funny that there are worse bowlers than Bracken playing international cricket then.tooextracool said:i would come up with specific names, had i been watching aussie domestic cricket. but im fairly sure that they are better bowlers than bracken in the domestic cricket of any test playing country.