PlayerComparisons
International Captain
How would you rank these three Indian legends?
Who cares? Which one of these had the most value to India ?A FTB versus some of the best grinders lol
That's why he doesn't matters.Who cares? Which one of these had the most value to India ?
Definitely not Sehwag outside Asia. And the other two are titans in Asia anyway.Who cares? Which one of these had the most value to India ?
Sehwag was a lot more valuable in Asia and India plays a lot more in Asia than out of AsiaDefinitely not Sehwag outside Asia. And the other two are titans in Asia anyway.
Unless the other player is Jadeja or WoakesIf in doubt, remember:
Sehwag > [not Sehwag]
Titan is a big word. Only Sehwag is a titan in Asia.Definitely not Sehwag outside Asia. And the other two are titans in Asia anyway.
I don't think he was a lot more valuable in Asia. And besides, I'm only interested in knowing who the better batsman is. Not who will prosper the most in a single continent.Sehwag was a lot more valuable in Asia and India plays a lot more in Asia than out of Asia
43 averaging Pujara vs 50 averaging Sehwag?I don't think he was a lot more valuable in Asia. And besides, I'm only interested in knowing who the better batsman is. Not who will prosper the most in a single continent.
He was a LOT more valuable in Asia and given India plays 60% of its matches in Asia, he’s the better batsman. Being better is not some abstract thing, context matters and the context for Indian batsmen is they play a lot of cricket in Asia.I don't think he was a lot more valuable in Asia. And besides, I'm only interested in knowing who the better batsman is. Not who will prosper the most in a single continent.
And your point is?Virender Sehwag king pair caps another day of England mastery
![]()
India 224 & 35-1; England 710-7 dec | Third Test day three match report
Alastair Cook fell six runs short of a triple-century before Virender Sehwag fell first ball to seal another day of total England supremacy in the third Testwww.theguardian.com