subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Ok but that all takes for granted that greats in strong teams get dropped and then make it back. Many of the ordinary cricketers don't. So yes their early career stats are protected but they had to take a risk of being dropped.I don't exactly discount poor performances on the back of team strength, but there is no doubt they make a difference to records. Guys in weak teams debut often early, and stick in the team despite initial failures. Which drags their career stats down. See Hadlee and Marshall. Both played too early and averaged about infinity in their first few games. Marshall got his stats protected a bit by the WSC guys coming back and getting dropped. Hadlee played a lot of games cos his team was consistently weak and got his stats burned a bit. He averages 35 in his first 5 years and 20 after. Would have been considered a better bowler if he had been dropped for longer at the beginning and ended up with the GOAT average.
Kallis- super weak middle order early career. They averaged about 30 for a a couple of years either side of debut. That (plus his bowling) was getting him into the team before he was test quality as a bat. Which impacted his record. His average from 95-98 is 31 (25 till 97). From 98 till career end is 59. That's including his decline at the end.