• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jasprit Bumrah vs Rahul Dravid vs Kapil Dev

Who is the greatest test cricketer of these three?


  • Total voters
    30

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I consider Waqar and Walsh ATGs.
Kapil just below Walsh.. ie ATVG.

Anyway, you think Kapil is 2 leagues below Donald.. And Kapil's 30+ batting avg is not good enough to bridge the gap.

Going by that logic, Sobers is at least 4 or 5 leagues below Bradman as batsman.right?
Kapil is not "just below" Walsh in bowling
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Sure. I'm asking whether he is close to being in that 10.
Top 40 cricketers of All Time

Tier 1
Bradman / Sobers / Marshall / Hobbs / Warne / McGrath / Hadlee / Tendulkar / Richards

Tier 2
Imran / Steyn / Muralitharan / Smith / Lara / Hammond / Kallis / Hutton / Ambrose / Gilchrist / Richards / Gavaskar / O'Reilly / Lillee / Headley / Wasim

Tier 3
Chappell / Donald / Border / Ponting / Sangakkara / Lindwall / Miller / Knott / Holding / Pollock / Waugh / Procter / Pollock / Dravid / Davidson

Tier 4 (borderline)
Trueman / Garner / Sutcliffe / Weekes / Root / Bumrah* / Younis / Barrington

Cummins / Botham / Walcott

Borderline / Outside (not in order)
Younis / Worrell / Compton / Miandad / Greenidge / Harvey / Smith / Rabada / Roberts / Anderson / Boycott / Walsh / Tayfield / Gibbs

Dev / Lloyd / Simpson / Taylor

Thrown together quickly. Sure I forgot names and after a point the positions become almost meaningless.

Most importantly, the lower you go, the more the lines become blurred between what is an ATG.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Knott two tiers ahead of Harvey? Tendulkar a tier ahead of Imran? Sangakkara a tier higher than Root? Pollock a tier higher than Trueman? bruh
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Kapil not being a World Class bowler is laughable tbh..... Yes, 80s were bowler friendly, and no, that wasn't for India. It's like saying Roberts wasn't Great because WI had so many ATG bowlers around then and shortly after.
That's why I reference outside of India, where he averaged 32 with the ball.

Or was outside not bowler friendly either?

At some point you have to just stop.

You can't blame playing in India for averaging 32 outside of India where you had bowlers averaging low 20's.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
That's why I reference outside of India, where he averaged 32 with the ball.

Or was outside not bowler friendly either?

At some point you have to just stop.

You can't blame playing in India for averaging 32 outside of India where you had bowlers averaging low 20's.
Dude ****ing averages 25 in WI and Australia. Do you think Gibbs was above average as well??
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
No he said Kapil is an 'above test standard bowler'. Basically like a Sarfraz Nawaz/Kaspa level bowler.

Then when I pressed him what he meant he refused to respond and now is trying to pretend it means 'very good'.

He is such a weasel.

Never trust anything Kyear says.
How people categorize can be very different.

But the fact remains, and despite the terms used, he wasn't an ATG, he wasn't great and considering the era, world class over the duration of his career isn't a given.

Think it was Coronis who displayed a graph where his bowling average literally fell on the mean for the era.

Just, consideration is given to playing in India, but again, outside of India he averaged even more. I was looking through his numbers for a peak, and there isn't a a sustained period where his average isn't basically what his career average is.

And again, this is the 80's.

And you're free to believe what the **** ever you want, because literally everything you post is ringed with an agenda and it pathetic af.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
I consider Waqar and Walsh ATGs.
Kapil just below Walsh.. ie ATVG.

Anyway, you think Kapil is 2 leagues below Donald.. And Kapil's 30+ batting avg is not good enough to bridge the gap.

Going by that logic, Sobers is at least 4 or 5 leagues below Bradman as batsman.right?
Ummmmm

Marshall / McGrath

Hadlee / Ambrose / Steyn / Warne / Muralitharan

Donald / Lillee / Wasim / Holding / Imran / O'Reilly

Lindwall / Bumrah / Trueman / Garner / Pollock / Davidson / Cummins / (Barnes)



Younis / Walsh / Rabada / Anderson / Roberts / Miller / Statham / Willis

And that's just the pacers in that tier, so it's still the spinners, then the other bowlers in subsequent tiers like Hall, Philander, Snow etc before I get to Kapil, it's considerably more than two tiers.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Knott two tiers ahead of Harvey? Tendulkar a tier ahead of Imran? Sangakkara a tier higher than Root? Pollock a tier higher than Trueman? bruh
Yes for Knott.

He's easily an ATG, one of only 2 legitimate candidates for the greatest keeper batsman of all time? Most definitely.

Re Tendulkar and the first tier. Bradman, my legitimate candidates for BAB, and my two GOAT bowling candidates. Hadlee is close enough to the GOAT debate (if not in it for some) that his batting does make a difference, and Warne is a top 5 lock outside of CW, my top spinner and right there with Hadlee.

Trueman can easily go up, but not brining Pollock down.

Player ranking is fraught with danger, comparing batsmen with bowlers, with all rounders.

I personally prefer the straight up ranking re disciplines, but the overall thing is inevitable.
 
Last edited:

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
What is your definition of an ATG?
a player excellent regardless of conditions with great performances and consistency over a large sample size, one who gets generally rated among the best and could be argued to be the best of their era, or atleast could be argued they'd be best had they played in a different era.
 

Top