They are all equally inept.irfan said:just as a little aside.
who do u guys think is next best middle order prospect out of Key, Joyce and Shah???
as i havent seen much of joyce or shah to comment on who's the best
Joyce for me...irfan said:just as a little aside.
who do u guys think is next best middle order prospect out of Key, Joyce and Shah???
as i havent seen much of joyce or shah to comment on who's the best
For what it matters i wrote that, just forgot to log out of Thamba's account...new_age_ar said:Joyce for me...
Shah seems to be more of a OD type player from what i've seen, but apparently has improved his game in the longer version dramatically last season.
Key IMO is a better Top 3 option then in the middle order.
The other guy is Ali Cook, but like Key he is more of a top order batsmen.
i haven't seen much either but all had a fantastic domestic season this year.irfan said:just as a little aside.
who do u guys think is next best middle order prospect out of Key, Joyce and Shah???
as i havent seen much of joyce or shah to comment on who's the best
I wouldn't say that his bowling is that useful an asset.Maison said:well i spose it would be good to have collingwood................... in the sidelines as a 'backup batsman', and he can bowl a few overs aswell so thats handy.
i'll never understand the point of bringing in an opener to replace a middle order batsman. its one of joyce,shah or key for the tour of india, depending on which one of them has a better track record against spin.chaminda_00 said:Its seems that most people beleive that Collingwood isn't good enough to play Test Cricket. Who do you guys beleive should replace him in the Test sqaud then. Cook, Joyce, Shah or Key...
i would think the reason hes in the side is because he offers an option of being picked as a specialist batsman, otherwise going in with 2 keepers that cant keep doesnt make much sense, even if geraint has looked considerably better on this tour.chaminda_00 said:I was talking more about the next series, also is Prior good enough to play as a Test specialist batsmen...
owais shah has been consistently scoring runs in domestic cricket since 2001 at good averages, anything that happened before that is rather irrelevant. and for someone with a list A average of 31 you'd think people would realise that he was never cut out to be an ODI batsman anyways, especially when you consider that he was picked to bat out of position.open365 said:Shah was pleyed in the ODIs a while back but apart from 2 gutsy 50s against India,he didn't show much else to cement his place. Despite a fantastic season this year,he's only averaging 41 at FC level and though FC averages can be deceptive, i don't see him playing for England again.
can you please explain to me how someone who had a SR of 65 in ODIs and a list A average of 31 is supposed to be an ODI player?new_age_ar said:Shah seems to be more of a OD type player from what i've seen, but apparently has improved his game in the longer version dramatically last season.
Who?aussie said:Shaw
I don't rate him. I mean, look at his FC stats......steds said:Who?
Barney Rubble said:I don't rate him. I mean, look at his FC stats......
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/england/content/player/20135.html
Obviously the answer to Vaughan's poor batting as captain.cricinfo said:in 2002 the popular cricketer was appointed as Glamorgan`s 2nd XI captain. His team only lost one Championship match in 2002
Well Key is a opening batsmen as far as im concerned, so its the same situation IMO.tooextracool said:i'll never understand the point of bringing in an opener to replace a middle order batsman. its one of joyce,shah or key for the tour of india, depending on which one of them has a better track record against spin.
Shaw can't bat so you have to bring in Loudon and have this side:steds said:Adrian Shaw is the future.
Trescothick
Strauss
Vaughan
Bell
Pietersen
+*Shaw
Flintoff
Giles
Hoggard (or S Jones if fit)
Harmison
Panesar/Marshall
will be the team in India. Just watch