theres a comma in it instead of a period after the wwwDravid said:link is not working
ThanksTurbinator said:theres a comma in it instead of a period after the www
If he keeps on performing like that in the Champs trophy he will be on there for sureClapo said:Great Stuff by Hussey!! One must ask though, what does Michael Clarke have to do to get up there?? He was again brilliant this series, his knock in the 1st match was unlucky not to get him the MOTM award. He again saved our backsides in the 2nd match, and then scored quick runs in the final overs of the final!
My sentiments exactly Clapo, Clarke is a brilliant ODI batsman who almost always makes a good contribution to the Australian innings. But looking at the list of the Top 10 Ranked ODI Batsman you could say that all of them are very destructive players, with perhaps the exception of Sarwan and Sangakarra who are not as aggressive or destructive. I think that is perhaps why Clarke isn't currently in the top 10, and also the fact that he doesn't bat high up like almost all of those players. He is sitting at number 11, only 5 points behind Sangakarra so I would expect him to break into the top 10 during the Champions Trophy.Clapo said:Great Stuff by Hussey!! One must ask though, what does Michael Clarke have to do to get up there?? He was again brilliant this series, his knock in the 1st match was unlucky not to get him the MOTM award. He again saved our backsides in the 2nd match, and then scored quick runs in the final overs of the final!
He earned a lot of points for his previous performance...which another bowler still has to beat.silentstriker said:How the HELL is Pathan still in the top ten bowling?
What the HELL do you have against Indian Pacers.silentstriker said:How the HELL is Pathan still in the top ten bowling?
Um, the fact that they suck?Turbinator said:What the HELL do you have against Indian Pacers.
Perhaps he was actually a top-class one-day bowler over the past year, with the exception of the last two series? Worth consideration IMO.silentstriker said:How the HELL is Pathan still in the top ten bowling?
There's a reason rankings aren't made "on form". The rankings are made based on performance in a period short enough to reflect "recent" performance and long enough to not be drastically swayed by random (temporary) swings in "form". By your standard, Dravid and Ponting shouldn't be in the top 20 right now either as both had a poor series in Malaysia.silentstriker said:on form, there are definatly ten bowlers who are better than him atm. That's all.