luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
Don't you tell me what to do.Deja moo said:
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
How come...
- Thread starter pskov
- Start date
luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
Now THAT's something some ought to try - urinating on their keyboard to mark their territory.....SJS said:BTW, for some its also a question of protecting their turf
ouch
Huh to all . Pskov why not you give an idea what to say ...
Marc n Richard aint that bad . When ever I log on and if marc comes then all the threads get last post (marc) treatment and I get interested that what sweeping statement is there .
Pskov why not you just check off topic and other sub forums , We all try to present some thing good . Freedom of expression right . So enjoy your self dude .
I like to argue too with the following good guys
1. Deja Moo
2. Lucky Eddie
3. Marc
4. Bouncer
5. Choora aka(Chooray)
6. Swervy (though just once but we argued for about 6-7 sub pages about the swearing and sledging matter )
So without argument there is no need for a good forum . One thing i like here is that most of the regular posters are well behaved except (some patriotics) . I get bored personaly if there is no challenge ....
Marc n Richard aint that bad . When ever I log on and if marc comes then all the threads get last post (marc) treatment and I get interested that what sweeping statement is there .
Pskov why not you just check off topic and other sub forums , We all try to present some thing good . Freedom of expression right . So enjoy your self dude .
I like to argue too with the following good guys
1. Deja Moo
2. Lucky Eddie
3. Marc
4. Bouncer
5. Choora aka(Chooray)
6. Swervy (though just once but we argued for about 6-7 sub pages about the swearing and sledging matter )
So without argument there is no need for a good forum . One thing i like here is that most of the regular posters are well behaved except (some patriotics) . I get bored personaly if there is no challenge ....
Last edited:
Scaly piscine
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Having said I don't mind tooextracool before I take that back after he'd posted a series of tedious mile-long replies to Richard this morning (5AM BST ish), another tedious thread-hogger. Even if they got anything right (which is doubtful) there is so much garbage replying to the other tedious thread-hog mixed in that it's simply not worth reading. I hope in future Richard and tooextracool can bore each other to death on a messenger instead. Simply saying that it's easy to scroll past their messages is a poor excuse, would people accept pages and pages of banner adverts mixed in to each thread without being mildly irritated?
luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
This message is hidden because luckyeddie is on your ignore list.
luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
WHAT???????Richard said:
It's TEC's hobby horse - it's in his signature.
aussie_beater
State Vice-Captain
Hmmm...I guess you were so engrossed in those arguments with TEC that never got a chance to look at his signature.Richard said:
tooextracool
International Coach
do you have anything to contribute to any of those threads? i personally would rather have a bunch of so called boring posts(aint like some of your posts have been any more interesting either) then have absolutely nothing in them.Scaly piscine said:
Swervy
International Captain
To be honest I think in the time Scaly has been on here, he has made several worthwhile commentstooextracool said:
The problem with all these huge posts with tons of quotes is that it is so hard to keep track on what quote relates to what and everything,and I personally just cant be bothered going up and down finding out what on earth is being talked about...
TEC, maybe its time to just leave it alone. I agree with a lot of things you say over Richard, but all this oneupmanship(is that one word..never typed it before) is making these threads go on for ever without going anywhere..and often off the original topic.
Someone said it was thread evolution...it would be if progress was made, but none is. You are both just being stubborn...so it only takes one of you to say 'ok..i dont agree, but lets just leave it'..end of story...and then we can all get back to having proper discussions about things other than lucky bowlers,or which wicket turned where and at what time etc
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
luckyeddie said:
Err... no, actually, I just don't have signatures displayed in my preferances. I just got so bored of seeing the same things time and again, and they added to the time the pages took to come-up (I didn't used to have Broadband). So I disabled them.aussie_beater said:
I did this before tooextracool turned-up and so I've never actually seen his signature.
Will check it out, though.
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
What - agreeing with you on the "whatever Richard writes is automatically rubbish"? I thought you had more sense than that, Swervy, I thought you didn't just dismiss it out-of-hand. You have at times indicated that you believe there is some sense in my unorthodox ideas (not a lot - that would be asking far too much, for anyone - even Craig). I confess myself disappointed.Swervy said:
Swervy
International Captain
Richard said:What - agreeing with you on the "whatever Richard writes is automatically rubbish"? I thought you had more sense than that, Swervy, I thought you didn't just dismiss it out-of-hand. You have at times indicated that you believe there is some sense in my unorthodox ideas (not a lot - that would be asking far too much, for anyone - even Craig). I confess myself disappointed.
all I said was that he has made some worthwhile comments..I havent said what they were...he has shown an understanding of the game..thats all, I wasnt talking about any comments he has made about you Richard.
And no Richard,I dont see your name and instantly think' this will be rubbish'..I normally read what you have to say before thinking that
I think though Richard, when I first came on here, I did think some of what you said was a bit strange but I could see glimmers of hope in there. The problem I have is that there is very little give and take in what you say.The impact of what you say is dwindling with each arguement you enter and refuse to see the other persons view on...almost because its becoming repetitive in its unorthodoxy (nobody is saying forget what you beleive, but you frequently dismiss what others say as being wrong...although yes TEC is as bad as you in that respect). I think in your heart of hearts you will know that you misjudged say someone like Harmison or someone like that (or some other issue)..but you will not be seen to back down...which is a shame..coz if you did, people might start warming to your ideas a bit more, and then you will be making progress
Now you do say that you arent bothered in the slightest in what other people say about your theories,as long as you know such and such to be right, then thats all that matters...if that is all that matters, why do you 'publicise' your views here at CW, why not keep them to yourself....unless you are trying to provoke a reaction (that is what I am tryingto avoid know really, coz it gets no-one anywhere)