MasterBlaster24
U19 Debutant
.
who is better in EnglandHanif and it's not close
Justin ofcourse but Hanif had the better inningswho is better in England
really?Justin ofcourse but Hanif had the better innings
I mean, I thought it was pretty much evidentreally?
innings implied two, Hanif only has one good inning in EnglandI mean, I thought it was pretty much evident
*Inning. Hanif has the better inninginnings implied two, Hanif only has one good inning in England
innings implied two, Hanif only has one good inning in England
This isn't baseball you fools. The singular form is innings.*Inning. Hanif has the better inning
Its almost like they don’t actually watch cricketThis isn't baseball you fools. The singular form is innings.
I am very confused, I was supposed to call Stokes's 135 an "innings" all this time???This isn't baseball you fools. The singular form is innings.
Yes. Nobody has ever referred to any score as an inning. And if they did, they’re completely wrong.I am very confused, I was supposed to call Stokes's 135 an "innings" all this time???
I blame this on the United StatesYes. Nobody has ever referred to any score as an inning. And if they did, they’re completely wrong.
I believe from any recent match thread you’ll easily be able to find the phrase “great/lucky/bad/whatever innings” in reference to a single batsman’s effort.
Classic England still saltyI blame this on the United States
oh shut upClassic England still salty
Surprised we haven’t republicised yet.oh shut up
I blame it on @Johan for gaslighting meThis isn't baseball you fools. The singular form is innings.
Easier to go with the flow. Thought might be Mandela effect or some ****why are you so easily gaslit