• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Fred Trueman vs Michael Holding

Who is the better test bowler?


  • Total voters
    17

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
What I find hilarious from @Johan is that a few weeks ago, he was a discussion how close to Holding was to Marshall, how his dad was it, questioned who the best of the WI from that era.

But now somehow Trueman is easily better.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
What I find hilarious from @Johan is that a few weeks ago, he was a discussion how close to Holding was to Marshall, how his dad was it, questioned who the best of the WI from that era.

But now somehow Trueman is easily better.
Big fan of both guys, never said one is easily better or worse than the other. You're just hurt in your feels because I don't overrate Chappell.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Big fan of both guys, never said one is easily better or worse than the other. You're just hurt in your feels because I don't overrate Chappell.
Would go quite that far.

Yes, he's not the best bat of the era, actually never really was. But don't understand what's with the recent separation between he and Sunny, he was an ATG batsman in a difficult era.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Yes, he's not the best bat of the era, actually never really was. But don't understand what's with the recent separation between he and Sunny, he was an ATG batsman in a difficult era.
I just think he's held to a different standard of away scrutiny than most other cricketers of ATG standard are held to. Kike Legit, I think Beefy was better.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Even a guy under 5 different kind of drugs won't claim Botham was a better batsman than Chappell
That's what I was thinking, lol

Anyways, England seems to want to sweep this game away, time for tennis.

Go Sinner
 

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
People are just poo pooing his proportion of home Tests, where he played better.

I don't think that explains how great he was though. Trueman was a proper strike bowler and led the attack and led to wins. I tend to like players who fit that category, so I went with him.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Even a guy under 5 different kind of drugs won't claim Botham was a better batsman than Chappell
Surely there’s someone.

Anyway I’m not sure what your issue is with Chappell. His main weakness is a relatively poor record in England. Which is still far better than say, Root’s record in Australia
 

DrWolverine

International Captain
That’s a surprising poll result. I feel like Trueman used to be rated clearly above Garner, Donald, Holding, and Akram.
Most of us never saw Fred Trueman play so we have to rely on his records and it isn’t that impressive.

IMG_8910.jpeg

Great record at home.
Never played in Asia.
Averages 27.5 in Aus & 32 in Eng.
 

DrWolverine

International Captain
Michael Holding had an ATG series in India.
6 Tests. 30 wickets @ 22 and SR of 45.

Allan Donald never played a full proper 5 Test series but his overall record in Asia is great.
9 Tests. 36 wickets @ 20 and SR of 48.
 

sayon basak

International Coach
Michael Holding had an ATG series in India.
6 Tests. 30 wickets @ 22 and SR of 45.

Allan Donald never played a full proper 5 Test series but his overall record in Asia is great.
9 Tests. 36 wickets @ 20 and SR of 48.
Fred Trueman not playing in Asia should be plus if anything. Asian teams back then weren't some immovable object.
 

Top