Does cricket need a strong England?

[Socerer 01]

Top 8 is enough. Don't need or care for the minnow nations.

there is always that 1 dude who says **** like this

 

[Coronis]

there is always that 1 dude who says **** like this

I’d love it if the minnows took over cricket eventually. I mean, New Zealand pretty much did and look where they were for decades.

Would be hilarious if in 20 years the top 4 teams were Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Afghanistan and Ireland.

(or the Windies of course so we can have a strong West Indies)

 

[SillyCowCorner1]

Would be hilarious if in 20 years the top 4 teams were Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Afghanistan and Ireland.

In 20 years, the top 4 teams will be, Mumbai Indians England, Chennai Super Kings Australia, Gujarat India Titans, and Kolkata Knight Riders USA

 

[honestbharani]

In 20 years, the top 4 teams will be, Mumbai Indians England, Chennai Super Kings Australia, Gujarat India Titans, and Kolkata Knight Riders USA

And we will rival 'murica with a world series played between city based franchises of one country.

 

[SillyCowCorner1]

And we will rival 'murica with a world series played between city based franchises of one country.

That would be so freaking awesome!

 

[RossTaylorsBox]

In 20 years, the top 4 teams will be, Mumbai Indians England, Chennai Super Kings Australia, Gujarat India Titans, and Kolkata Knight Riders USA

Lmao

 

[Burgey]

The international game has got along just fine for 150 odd years with England mostly being trash. No reason to think that needs to or indeed will change

 

[thundaboult]

yes it does because cricket is played by like 10 countries and only a few of them are actually good at any given time