Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy.I hate myself for voting seriously in this one.
Yeah but he has the most wickets of a pace bowler ever, thats got to count for something.One of these guys brought fear amongst batsman and the other didn't and still doesn't.
nah, mine was a meme vote based on PEWS ranking systemTrying to understand the Anderson votes.
@Prince EWS and @Coronis are easy enough to figure, @Socerer 01 believes newer is better and @ataraxia made his opinions clear in the opening post.
Sorry to say.....I can see the poll will close in 2054. So you want us to fully evaluate Andy's career before it even ends.....
Yeah, these polls just helps in knowing who's opinions not to take too seriously.Seriously, Anderson should be getting nil votes here.
Yes it is.This is insulting to Lillee.
Anderson's better than Lillee without even considering longevity. As in, his test record is plainly better.Yes it is.
This is when we know that the longevity argument has officially gone too far. I mean it has for a while, but this is definitive proof.
“Lillee for his batting”Anderson's better than Lillee without even considering longevity. As in, his test record is plainly better.
Mind, if you consider Lillee's batting then it becomes closer.
Well this is obviously yet another area where we starkly disagree.Anderson's better than Lillee without even considering longevity. As in, his test record is plainly better.
Mind, if you consider Lillee's batting then it becomes closer.
Lillee averaged 24 in very pace-friendly conditions. Anderson averaged 26 is mildly pace-friendly conditions.Well this is obviously yet another area where we starkly disagree.
They aren't in the same ballpark as bowlers.