• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Dennis Lillee v Jimmy Anderson

Who was a better bowler?


  • Total voters
    49
  • This poll will close: .

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Jimmy clearly, Lillee averaged 100+ in Asia and couldn't even get a wicket in West Indies, just an overrated green track bully from an amateur era. Anderson has taken 700 wickets in a more professional and competitive era.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Yes it is.

This is when we know that the longevity argument has officially gone too far. I mean it has for a while, but this is definitive proof.
Anderson's better than Lillee without even considering longevity. As in, his test record is plainly better.

Mind, if you consider Lillee's batting then it becomes closer.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Anderson's better than Lillee without even considering longevity. As in, his test record is plainly better.

Mind, if you consider Lillee's batting then it becomes closer.
Well this is obviously yet another area where we starkly disagree.

They aren't in the same ballpark as bowlers.
 

Top