Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
No, I never did anything of the sort - I presume he bowled well in West Indies, I presume the conditions didn't offer much to seamers there, given that Scott Styris scored a century and half-century in the same match.tooextracool said:no the point is that you seemed to deny that bond ever bowled well outside of the seaming conditions and poor batting lineups,when he quite clearly hasnt,and that too without watching that series....
However, he didn't bowl especially well in Sri Lanka, otherwise he'd have got a decent average. No-one can bowl penetratively and get a poor average, unless they've had lots of catches dropped off wicket-taking balls.
No, it hasn't been shown as false - if it had, I would not be stupid enough to carry-on arguing that it is true.it is true if you would only be able to take another persons viewpoint instead of sticking to what you believe is true when its quite clearly false and has been shown on several occasions on the cricket field
There have been instances that contravene it, but because there have been far more instances that back it up, the contradictions are irrelevant.