• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Batsmen that have a good eye but not a good technique

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
And head stillness and position are part of technique as much as footwork is. You're obsessed with feet. If Tendulkar reckons Sehwag is closest to him, I'll take his overall assessment over yours.
I never said he wasn't close to Tendulkar in head stillness and position! I am not sure what your position is: that A) he has textbook MCC style technique, or B) that only MCC style technique is effective.


I am not arguing B) with you - that's up to you to decide, and in this day and age, I would say it's correct. I am saying Tendulkar is closer to A) than Sehwag is. That's it. I am not speaking of effectiveness here.
 
Last edited:

Top