• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Barry Richards vs. Graeme Pollock

Barry Richards vs. Graeme Pollock: better bat?

  • Total voters
    15
subshakerz

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
kyear2 said:
It's easily Barry.

He was hailed by no less than Bradman as the greatest opener of all time. "At least the equal of Hutton and Hobbs"

Lille rated him only behind Viv and Sobers among batsmen he bowled to and in the same tier.

Procter, Gooch, Dickie Bird called him the batsmen period they've ever seen.

Pollock himself said the two best batsmen he had seen in and after his career were Richards and Sobers.

Mark Nicholas ranks him behind only Bradman, Sobers and Tendulkar. Kimber notes that as a batsman, he's top 10 all time.

Bob Willis, John Snow Jeff Thompson called him the best opener they've bowled to, all ahead of Gavaskar.

Barry was acknowledged as the best batsman in the world from.1970, until his namesake took the title in '76. He was the best opener of the '70's, his record vs the best bowlers of his day is unparalleled, triples and doubles vs Snow, Lillee, Procter et al. His record against touring test teams is in the 70's, his record in WSC was comparable only to Viv and Chappell.

Pollock never faced bowlers of the quality that Barry did, definitely not in tests, which shows the overrated nature and status of.

Barry was a Colossus, 9 hundreds before lunch, 300 in a day, the only batsman capable of keeping up with Vivian on the rampage, especially against quality bowling.

His comps were Richards and Sobers, to many his potential was Bradman.

His accolades were many, he makes Willis's all time team, the Cricinfo 2nd XI, Crowe called him the greatest lost war opener, the named him in his 2nd All Time Test team, Gower rates him the 15th best cricketer of all time, if we can be sure of 6 players that we know for sure made Bradman's all time team, they were Barry, himself, Tendulkar, Sobers, Lillee and O'Reilly.

There's a thread here by @fredfertang , how good was Barry Richards, I recommend to give it a read.

Many here goes against Barry because he bettered players that they preferred and for the fact that I'm the one who pushes him, but that should say more about them than Barry.

He was the most tested and accomplished opening batsman vs great fast bowling in helpful conditions. Yes Hutton took on Lindwall and Miller, and bats alongside Barry in my AT XI, but Barry took on Lillee, Thompson (in his actual prime), Procter, Snow and Willis. He's the only post war batsman to combine a perfect defensive technique and the ability to consistently destroy quality attacks in all conditions. He could do things that literally no one else could.
Click to expand...
Pollock:

- Considered Cricket SAs player of the century
- Regularly compared with Sobers
- Ranked by Wisden and ESPN ahead of Barry
- Proved himself at the test level with à 7 year career

Pollock > Barry
 
Johan

Johan

International Coach
I feel like Pollock is kind of hard done by the fact he didn't really go out and play in different countries. He never went for County Championship (where Barry was outperformed by Geoffrey), he never went to Australia to play Sheffield to my knowledge. After his international career, he kind of just stayed in South Africa till the natural conclusion of his career so he ended up being a lot less popular. In the 1965 England tour, not only did he make one of the most distinguished hundreds in english history and averaged 48.5 in Tests, which is exceptional for a 21 year old on his second tour overall and first tour of England. He also averaged 61 in Non-tests FC, gives me a clear indication that he would've done very well in English First Class. He also made a dominant 127* against McKenzie and Benaud at Perth, another hundred against Benaud, one hundred against Connoly and a fifty against Davidson/Tyson/McKenzie. All while as a 19 year old, playing his first tour and representing South Africa for the first time.

In South Africa, where both Barry and Graeme played, he was seen as the Best Batsman in the world from 1960s to 1980s, that says something.
 
Last edited:
Coronis

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Johan said:
I feel like Pollock is kind of hard done by the fact he didn't really go out and play in different countries. He never went for County Championship (where Barry was outperformed by Geoffrey), he never went to Australia to play Sheffield to my knowledge. After his international career, he kind of just stayed in South Africa till the natural conclusion of his career so he ended up being a lot less popular. In the 1965 England tour, not only did he make one of the most distinguished hundreds in english history and averaged 48.5 in Tests, which is exceptional for a 21 year old on his second tour overall and first tour of England. He also averaged 61 in Non-tests FC, gives me a clear indication that he would've done very well in English First Class.

In South Africa, he was seen as the Best Batsman in the world from 1960s to 1980s, that says something.
Click to expand...
According to him “the domestic grind was not 'my type of game’”
 
DrWolverine

DrWolverine

International Vice-Captain
IMG_8280.jpeg

After this tweet, many fans began guessing the others

Even Piers Morgan replied to his tweet with a guess
IMG_8281.jpeg

Finally Boycott made another tweet revealing the others


IMG_8282.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top