IMO Green's biggest problem remains his inability to rotate the strike. He doesn't seem able to drop the ball into a gap and get a single when he first comes in, and it places huge pressure on him and whoever he's batting with. It's worse when it happens up the order.Green is a trickier one, honestly don't know what do. Unlike Marnus and Khawaja I doubt whoever you would replace Green with is going to be much better long or short term. But as it stands he's barely good enough to hold a spot, and that's when he bowls
Yep there's not a lot of batting options. Would love to see Ward to come good. Inglis is a strange one. He's both close but far away. His spot is 5 or 6 imo and we seem to have better cover there.These ICC final losses are coming all too close together these days. The first was in 75, and there wasn't another til 96, then the 2010 T20 loss and now this, only 15 years after the last. It won't do. Not up to scratch.
Obviously the batting is the main issue, but They really need to bite the bullet and start rotating the quicks through different tests as well. I get the pride and sanctity of wanting to play all of them, but long terms it's going to be counter-productive.
Re the batting, Khawaja obviously is near the end, even on his own time table. If he misses out in the Windies and they want to make a change, Konstas is the obvious first cab (not that I'm sold on him overall), but as you know I'm a big Tim Ward fan. He had a good return to the Shield last season and if he gets a good start again this year he should be a chance.
Marnus imo has had enough chances now and continues to not only fail but worse, does so in the same way. I'd bat McSweeney three atm, Smith (pending injury) four and Head five. Slug and Green can fight it out for the six spot. Green's ceiling is high, but he isn't a top order test player yet, and I still feel like he's almost trying to prove himself every time he walks out to bat, instead of just playing. Inglis the obvious contender for any middle order spot given his efforts in SL and despite a moderate FC record overall.
I know you are humblebragging, but there are 4 icc tourneys now to just 1 between 75 and 96. So the difference in count of ICC tourneys will be quite similar or even higher in these 14 and 15 years compared to those 21 years.These ICC final losses are coming all too close together these days. The first was in 75, and there wasn't another til 96, then the 2010 T20 loss and now this, only 15 years after the last. It won't do. Not up to scratch.
Feels like we're now in the position England spent a lot of the mid-late 00s in. Most of the potential replacement batsmen are best suited to bating 5 or 6.I think McSweeney was hit pretty hard mentally by being dropped, it seems to have seriously damaged his confidence and that's flowed into his batting.
Inglis basically has to play IMO, but where? Green really should be batting 4 if Smith is out, but Ingis at 3 just feels... weird.