If the Aussies had a decent bowling attack, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but at first glance Brett Lee is having a hard time of it.Nnanden said:all out for 43. you heard it here first
Three no-balls, three wides in five overs..even the West Indies'd be ashamed of that...luckyeddie said:If the Aussies had a decent bowling attack, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but at first glance Brett Lee is having a hard time of it.
The Windies will pick him up then, given that he's born in Guyana!Tim said:Massiah actually looks quite a good player...and he's only 24 so USA might have a star-player in the making.
panyangara however, is shocked at brett lee`s apparent lack of extras and writes a letter to the ACBSamuel_Vimes said:Three no-balls, three wides in five overs..even the West Indies'd be ashamed of that...
McGrath was extremely impressive though - and Kasprowicz has struck immediately.Samuel_Vimes said:Three no-balls, three wides in five overs..even the West Indies'd be ashamed of that...
You are being a little unfair. Australia aren't THAT bad.howardj said:There should be some type of by-law that prevents mis-matches of this ilk!! I mean, how does this sort of clash do anybody any good? It's so rare to get all the top teams together, and then the administrators serve up this tripe! It's a first-rate farce!
His name suggests he could well be just what cricket in the U.S needed.Tim said:Massiah actually looks quite a good player...and he's only 24 so USA might have a star-player in the making.
Going at just over 4 an over is not good against the U.S! But then I guess it depends on how they got them, edges all over the place, or fluid cover drives and pulls etc (or the last option, all in extras! haha).luckyeddie said:If the Aussies had a decent bowling attack, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but at first glance Brett Lee is having a hard time of it.