HouHsiaoHsien
International Debutant
And Steyn was better than Imran in Aus atleast. Same average, same WPM, but Steyn bowled on flatter wickets there
Look, no doubt Eng and Aus in his time were flatter so I don't think he was the seeming level of averaging 32 and 30 there. I think his adjusted averages would be somewhere around 28/29 and 26/27 in these countries assuming regular pitches, which would be middling and good, not good and near ATG.The way I see you take his records with the era. So Steyn was fantastic in Aus(by virtue of WPM, as well, and his SR). And in Eng, he played against their best lineup in decades on flat wickets, so performing better than two of the bowlers most attuned to those conditions means you are good there.
Slightly better than IK I agree but both good level IMO.And Steyn was better than Imran in Aus atleast. Same average, same WPM, but Steyn bowled on flatter wickets there
Good in Eng. Near ATG in Aus he outperformed all his contemporaries there average wise, his WPM and SR anyways are awesome there. His adjusted average would 24-25 there. And don’t look at their average in isolation, seen in combination of WPM and SR and the fact that he was the most important bowler in SA’s initial series win there.Slightly better than IK I agree but both good level IMO.
His average there is 28 btw.Look, no doubt Eng and Aus in his time were flatter so I don't think he was the seeming level of averaging 32 and 30 there. I think his adjusted averages would be somewhere around 28/29 and 26/27 in these countries assuming regular pitches, which would be middling and good, not good and near ATG.
You had a good run.No more comparison ideas. Time for me to retire.
Ok TamimNo more comparison ideas. Time for me to retire.
This is like Mankind retiring and then Cactus Jack coming in later in the same night.No more comparison ideas. Time for me to retire.