h_hurricane
International Vice-Captain
Rahane averages 40.28 in away matches. KW 39.89.
Discuss. Who is better away ?
Discuss. Who is better away ?
oi ****Flem waking up tomorrow
[...]
"haha kohli sucks etc insert more paragraphs of lower case typing"
Haha, I've always considered it an attempt to project indifference. Which I guess is fair enough on a cricket forumoi ****
It's just another breakdown of stats people use to fit their narrative, just like runs/wickets against Bangladesh/west indies arnt worth the same as against England despite the fact that the former two are actually a more difficult prospect currently. India can't win in nz but nz can't win in Australia so that means saf are the best team currently? IdkWhy even bother playing Tests at home if it does nothing for your legacy?
Visiting batters usually struggle vs Yasir Shah in the UAE, but Williamson has done superbly there and was the best batter in the WTC final.Do we count neutral matches?
That's besides the point for me. We can get into matchups and quality of opposition afterwards lol.Visiting batters usually struggle vs Yasir Shah in the UAE, but Williamson has done superbly there and was the best batter in the WTC final.
the op is weak bait but this is kinda funny i'll pay this one tbhIn all seriousness, the averages are pretty close but they can be a bit misleading.
If you remove the minnows, Williamsons away average drops to about 34, while Rahane stays around 40. So Rahane is undoubtedly better just because he’s a lot more valuable against the top teams.
It certainly does. Just not as much as performing awayWhy even bother playing Tests at home if it does nothing for your legacy?
Seems like NZC heard you 10 years ago.Why even bother playing Tests at home if it does nothing for your legacy?