God save the game then lol!No, numbnuts - you surely can’t be that thick?
We’d pick Jadeja
God save the game then lol!No, numbnuts - you surely can’t be that thick?
We’d pick Jadeja
Oh I didn't get the memo. Changing my vote to ABD.Ofcourse the Jadeja trolls may pick ABD
You also forgetting even when was a keeper he batted at no 3 which is basically playing as an opener and the other wicketkeeper always batted down at no 5-7(including Gilchrist)2006
7 tests as WKB averaged 48-49
4 tests as Specialist Batsman - 120+ avg
2000-2006
47 tests as WKB avgd 41
17 tests as Specialist Batsman avgd 79
+1Shout out to my man, Prassana Jayawardene
Safe keeper.hm, how do people rate De Villier's actual keeping?
He thought he was quite good to Murali, and if Murali was in my 1st team I think I would bring Sanga along with him.hm, how do people rate De Villier's actual keeping?
The question was about de Villiers though.... But yeah, I also feel that having either of Gilchrist or Sanga in your team isn't really different; Gilchrist is a bit better keep and more suited to bat down the order imo.He thought he was quite good to Murali, and if Murali was in my 1st team I think I would bring Sanga along with him.
From everything I've read Walcott was a more than decent keeper and especially good to spin. Don't know how he would have held up to subsequent quartet attacks. Dujon was made to keep for that attack.If we are talking about de Villiers; might as well include Walcott and Flower in the discussion....
No doubt there, but I believe keeping to spin is tougher than pace; so I believe he will do just fine.From everything I've read Walcott was a more than decent keeper and especially good to spin. Don't know how he would have held up to subsequent quartet attacks. Dujon was made to keep for that attack.