CricAddict
Cricketer Of The Year
I think we can keep debates of the ranking to this thread and leave that thread only for votes.
I debate Murali being ahead of Warne. Discuss.I think we can keep debates of the ranking to this thread and leave that thread only for votes.
Warne averaged close to 30 at home against non minnow teams in this millenium.I debate Murali being ahead of Warne. Discuss.
But Murali averaged 75 in the same conditions.Warne averaged close to 30 at home against non minnow teams in this millenium.
In 5 games. And he played those Tests in some really bad mental space. I think mental health isn't taken into consideration enough while rating players.But Murali averaged 75 in the same conditions.
That's not fun.While I can understand the interest in discussing the 2024 Bowling poll I am conducting, I would respectfully request that, as is the case up to now, that these discussions/debates are restricted to players currently voted into the places decided.
Just like your posts and your face.That's not fun.
Peer rating. Plus he was “more skilled” than any other bowler.Someone had mentioned there was an argument for Wasim to be seen as the best ever, I'll be interested in continuing that argument. Note I didn't say among the best, which he clearly was, but even among that top 4 or 5, what's the argument?
And that's the crux of the matterPeer rating. Plus he was “more skilled” than any other bowler.
Unfortunately for him, being more skilled didn’t quite bring the results you’d hope for.
the difference between Akram and any other top bowler is statistically insignificant.A high ceiling means squat if you don’t actually reach it.
skillSomeone had mentioned there was an argument for Wasim to be seen as the best ever, I'll be interested in continuing that argument. Note I didn't say among the best, which he clearly was, but even among that top 4 or 5, what's the argument?
im not arguing tbh, im saying why that argument existsThat's not an argument, lol
But yes, he was skillful.