LightningStrike
U19 Debutant
Saffers bat deep. They can still get a decent score.
As England showed against Afghanistan. You only need 12 balls to completely change the game.Though it seems applaudable by De Kock to still be out there, consuming a third of all balls available at a run-a-ball, is never ever a good thing in T20.
Tough to be hard on him. Guess the next5 overs will define his innings.Though it seems applaudable by De Kock to still be out there, consuming a third of all balls available at a run-a-ball, is never ever a good thing in T20.
As you said, that was against Afghanistan. I can't see that happening here, when, for instance, Badree is given the ball again.As England showed against Afghanistan. You only need 12 balls to completely change the game.
Plenty of time yet.
NZ defending 130 by a distance against India comes to mind. Not sure we've seen much danger in the wicket but so many getting out bowled to spinners says it can't be easy130 should be target, and that whilst below par is at least defendable
Yeah, the groundsman has clearly left some more grass on this one though. Less demons in pitch and ball coming onto bat as well.NZ defending 130 by a distance against India comes to mind. Not sure we've seen much danger in the wicket but so many getting out bowled to spinners says it can't be easy
Very hard to see that given net run rates as far as I can see. Would require SA to beat SL. But SA would surely have a better nrr than England in that case and go through.Windies pulling this off would be perfect for England. They could get through even if they lose.
A Gayle storm would ruin SA's nrr, not?Very hard to see that given net run rates as far as I can see. Would require SA to beat SL. But SA would surely have a better nrr than England in that case and go through.