• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    how does sathish average 37 in fc cricket he looks awful everytime i see him bat
  2. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    what a shot. all wrists that
  3. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    just admiring franklin benchmark00
  4. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    franklin just toying with this cummins kid now
  5. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    just missing leg that one too much movement
  6. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    pure *** franklin is
  7. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    the ball cut back in pollard didnt have a chance
  8. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    is there a more elegant left hander in the game today than franklin??
  9. D

    *Official* Champions League Twenty20 2011

    unplayable ball tbh
  10. D

    The greatest spinner of alltime

    vettori and patel missing
  11. D

    Why Gilchrist ahead of Sangakarra?

    howe_zat there is no way to prove that though something like that is always open to personal bias a proper stat to evaluvate a player should include how many runs he scored, the bowling attack he faced, the runs other players in the side scored stuff like 'he changed the game' or 'he's a match...
  12. D

    Why Gilchrist ahead of Sangakarra?

    playing attacking cricket shouldn't be a factor in assessing who is better as you said gilchrist was playing his natural game and he might have struggled to be as successful as flower playing a back to the wall innings. as it stands the only non biased stat for judging a batsmen is batting...
  13. D

    Why Gilchrist ahead of Sangakarra?

    very good argument unless somebody comes up with a stat like wOBA there no way to say gilchrist was a better batsman than flower using the current stats unless somebody has watched every single innings both have ever played.
  14. D

    Why Gilchrist ahead of Sangakarra?

    rza mate i totally agree with you. you should look at the nominations for the battle of centuries. it was basically 90% made up of aussies, english and indians does this mean the centuries kiwis,, lankans or whoever have hit are less valuable or great? no the fact is unless a player from minor...
  15. D

    Tim Bresnan

    safe to say none of the guys who posted here in 2009 will ever become very good cricket scouts if cricket was to ever have a draft system (goughy, aussie excepted) dont quit your day job guys
  16. D

    *Official* Third Test at Edgbaston

    the master is finished. let's crown ab devilliers the new master and move on from sachin.
  17. D

    *Official* Second Test at Trent Bridge

    it has been a mini classic so far hasn't it? :)
  18. D

    *Official* Second Test at Trent Bridge

    look he's doing the best he can ok?
  19. D

    *Official* Second Test at Trent Bridge

    dont be silly burgey everyone knows the master's back foot drive last innings was the best shot of the series
  20. D

    *Official* Second Test at Trent Bridge

    dont knock the master there's no need for that burgey ok?

Top