• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. A

    Better All Rounder Pair

    botham averages better with the ball too right with more wickets per match and better away record, more 5 fer, more ten fers etc. he also averages more and scores 4 runs more per innings, scores much more hundreds, averages better overseas, scores hundreds more often. kapil has wi record which...
  2. A

    Better All Rounder Pair

    Correct
  3. A

    Better All Rounder Pair

    No team in history comes close to wi attack
  4. A

    Better All Rounder Pair

    I don't think jadeja will do any better against them if he faced them outside Asia tbh. He's horrible against high bounce bowling.
  5. A

    All-Time World XIs

    May Harvey Ranji Laker
  6. A

    Kapil/Jadeja vs Botham/Flintoff

    You haven't really ignored me
  7. A

    Kapil/Jadeja vs Botham/Flintoff

    When did I said that? Show quick. I was focusing on subs point about overseas bowling. What's wrong with you? And btw few days back you said you will ignore me 😂😂😂
  8. A

    Better All Rounder Pair

    Yes Botham averages almost 10 more than kapil in top 6, that's a big gap. Stokes averages 40 in top 5 which is proper batsman position, and 37 in top 6.
  9. A

    Better All Rounder Pair

    Don't know man if we go purely by batting and bowling. Botham is definitely much better batsman than kapil, stokes much better batsman than jadeja. Botham definitely better bowler than kapil, yeah jadeja is much better bowler than stokes.
  10. A

    Kapil/Jadeja vs Botham/Flintoff

    Yes it wasn't, and flintoff averaging 7 better overseas in such a tough era for bowling shouldn't be kept under the carpet that easily.
  11. A

    Kapil/Jadeja vs Botham/Flintoff

    Don't think Flintoff was suited for English conditions. More of an SA/AUS-suited bowler. Before someone jumps on me, it's not an excuse. Just a point
  12. A

    Kapil/Jadeja vs Botham/Flintoff

    Correct once you adjust for variables
  13. A

    Better All Rounder Pair

    Better AR pair?
  14. A

    All-Time World XIs

    Compton Ranji Harvey I'm voting harvey ever since 3rd team, dont think he will get through even in this team. Seems to be very underrated here which is funny in a way because I think he would have been rated way higher if he averaged 1.5 more.
  15. A

    Graham Gooch vs Matthew Hayden

    I think they were better players of better bowlers.
  16. A

    Graham Gooch vs Matthew Hayden

    Both Gooch and Gower had very high peer rating tbh
  17. A

    Graham Gooch vs Matthew Hayden

    Genuinely want to know what are the arguments for Hayden being ahead or it's just the case of 42 vs 50 average And it's a very genuine question out of curiosity
  18. A

    Ponting vs Sangakkara (against pace)

    Obviously that's why my disagreement here. Few guys here made it look like as if sanga was some low grade scum against pace lmao
  19. A

    Ponting vs Sangakkara (against pace)

    Yeah Australian tracks of 2000s with those genius overseas attacks. I'm not even saying sanga was better against pace but you exaggerated so much with very little evidence to back it up.
  20. A

    Ponting vs Sangakkara (against pace)

    Pollock? Pollock when he was finished as a bowler and mostly on good batting wicket. Ambrose of 1999 on slow flat wicket. Waqar of 2003 in sl you mean, sangakkara has a better ton in lahore and I haven't even included that. None of the innings you shared suggests Ponting was some Viv Richards...

Top