• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Recent content by subshakerz

  1. S

    Inzamam vs Gooch vs Chanderpaul

    To be clear, they are separate issues. The more aggressive one is a tiebreaker between bats of roughly the same record. Batting up the order gets points compared to other bats.
  2. S

    De Silva Vs Miandad

    It's close.
  3. S

    De Silva Vs Miandad

    Nice. But using this peak metric, Miandad averaged 51 at a better than career SR between 1982 to 1988 in 115 games, including do quite well against WI and Aus...
  4. S

    Which attack do you rate higher?

    Arguable, yes. I agree. It literally isn't.
  5. S

    Which attack do you rate higher?

    Not in SENA.
  6. S

    De Silva Vs Miandad

    Miandad in ODIS was better than his SR suggests. He was literally the backbone behind many Pakistan innings and was much more consistent than DeSilva.
  7. S

    Which attack do you rate higher?

    In SA they did.
  8. S

    Inzamam vs Gooch vs Chanderpaul

    Great then you can compare how he did up the order versus down the order.
  9. S

    Inzamam vs Gooch vs Chanderpaul

    Define legit. Every position you bat down the order is easier than the one before. And why don't you consider Chanders 3/4 record legit but only his 5/6 record legit?
  10. S

    Inzamam vs Gooch vs Chanderpaul

    Um, I didn't know. That's why I checked and then I found Inzis no.6 was mostly early career and he didn't binge there like Chanders. Did you know Chanders record at 3/4 and why isnt that relevant?
  11. S

    Inzamam vs Gooch vs Chanderpaul

    It balances out since Gooch never played much vs SA like Inzi did who struggled against them. Bro, you say no to hypotheticals but then you engage in that towards the end when you assume he would have struggled with more tests vs Aus/SA. Which may be true, may be not. It seems the argument...
  12. S

    Inzamam vs Gooch vs Chanderpaul

    This seems unfairly penalising against Inzi. He didnt play SA/Aus as much so we assume he would do worse. And all his success in the 2000s should not be considered at all. Scoring in NZ and Eng don't count. Runs against Ambrose/Walsh dont count. Objectively Gooch has more holes in his record...
  13. S

    Inzamam vs Gooch vs Chanderpaul

    Well, Inzi like Gooch had a good tour against an ATG Aus team in 99, but that didn't stop us from saying he failed there overall. Inzi also scored against Gough/Caddick in 2001. Great but those performances are balanced with poor series as well. We can say he had a higher ceiling than Inzi...
  14. S

    Why is it viewed as more important

    No, specific to Kyear2, our issue with him at the moment is inconsistency. But he claims to accept flat pitch context, so my point on Imran and Steyn would be to penalise Steyn which I know he won't do hence I said that.
  15. S

    Why is it viewed as more important

    Maybe you misconstrued me. I am telling him to maintain one standard and stick with it. Either we contextualise for flatter pitches for all or we dont and take figures at face value. I can respect either position.
See more

Top