• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Recent content by Sachin114

  1. S

    Is Javed Miandad somewhat underrated and who was the best against the WIs in the 80s?

    I think he is rated fine as the best batsman from Pakistan. There have been several better #4 batsmen so it is difficult for Miandad to get a spot in an all-time XI. Amarnath and Boycott have an excellent record against the quartet.
  2. S

    India Squad for Zimbabwe and West Indies Tours

    He's only 27.
  3. S

    Question from a newbie

    Amla declared to have about half an hour to bowl at England before the day ends.
  4. S

    The ATG Teams General arguing/discussing thread

    McGrath Walsh Ntini James Anderson Muralitharan Warne Kumble Akram Vaas Ian Healy Vettori Combined batting average of 204.
  5. S

    2nd best ODI side?

    There is barely any difference in ODI pitches around the world. If Bangladesh does well at home, it is reasonable to think that they will be good away from home too.
  6. S

    The ATG Teams General arguing/discussing thread

    I don't think Jayasuriya has ever played at #3 in tests.
  7. S

    ***Official*** West Indies in Australia 2015/16

    Into the tail already...
  8. S

    Cricketweb decides the greatest bowler ever in a 64 player bracket. Contest thread.

    Is this about which bowler is more valuable for a team or which is the better bowler? Arguably a spinner like Muralitharan is more valuable for a team since he can bowl more overs than a fast bowler and as a result pick up more wickets. But that does not mean he is a better bowler.
  9. S

    Cricketweb decides the greatest bowler ever in a 64 player bracket. Contest thread.

    If we are looking at who is the better bowler, than it doesn’t matter how many wickets he gets you per match. That is dependent on many external factors such as bowling more overs or not having as competition from other bowlers for getting the wickets. To see how skillful a bowler is...
  10. S

    Mitchell Johnson Retires

    How was he going to play with Johnson even if Johnson hadn't retired?
  11. S

    Mitchell Johnson Retires

    Johnson is a test purist so he might not be interested in playing in that day/night match with the pink ball.
  12. S

    Cricketweb decides the greatest bowler ever in a 64 player bracket. Contest thread.

    He played 6 matches in Australia before 1986 and 5 afterwards. So he faced those three batsman in three matches (in Australia). He also faced Mark Waugh, Dean Jones, David Boon, Allan Border, Mark Taylor etc afterwards. Either way this wasn't a very weak Australian line up.
  13. S

    Cricketweb decides the greatest bowler ever in a 64 player bracket. Contest thread.

    He bowled at Greg Chappell, Allan Border, Kim Hughes, David Boon, Doug Walters, Mark Taylor etc.
  14. S

    Cricketweb decides the greatest bowler ever in a 64 player bracket. Contest thread.

    If you consider the Australian batsman he bowled at, it does seem odd that he did better in Australia compared to home. It surely wasn't just because of the pitches. There are many factors apart from the pitch that affect bowling performances.
  15. S

    Cricketweb decides the greatest bowler ever in a 64 player bracket. Contest thread.

    No he does not. http://www.howstat.com/cricket/statistics/Players/PlayerCountries.asp?PlayerID=0443 However even if he did, it wouldn't be only because of the pitches. Kapil's record in Australia is significantly better than his record at home. Is that only because Australian pitches were that...
See more

Top