• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Have India failed to capitalize on Bumrah?

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Shami is an immense loss to the team. Was the perfect new ball partner for Bumrah and even though he was never that good in England (always bowled too short), he was never too wayward in terms of accuracy. He'd have been enough of a handful in the Australia tour on those pitches especially to the extent where I think we'd have won that series.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Shami is an immense loss to the team. Was the perfect new ball partner for Bumrah and even though he was never that good in England (always bowled too short), he was never too wayward in terms of accuracy. He'd have been enough of a handful in the Australia tour on those pitches especially to the extent where I think we'd have won that series.
IIRC the word (before the most recent series of course) was that the Indian bowler the Aus players worried about the most was always Shami rather than Bumrah, they found him really really difficult to face.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
That's not true.
whatever, it’s an outlier. Every bowler has them. Bumrash has them less than anyone else. Great players don’t make teams. Pakistan failed to capitalize on Imran, Waqar and Wasim. South Africa failed to capitalize on Steyn. If you use the same argument and metrics
 

Top