The talent of being humble.Despite being the greatest batsman since Don, he was looking to improve himself and even took advice from a waiter in a hotel. View attachment 48916
See now this just comes off as completely contrary to almost everything you’ve said in the thread. People called bats like Trumper and Jackson exceptionally talented and geniuses for their strokeplay, and in fact Bradman was expected to fail in the 1930 Ashes by many pundits due to his technique (spoiler: he didn’t). Naturally talented? Hell no, he trained his ass off. You’ve not heard the origin story of him developing his muscle memory and reflexes by hitting a golf ball with a cricket stump in his youth. Hell, even his army test showed he had worse than 20/20 vision.lol if you think everyone can become Viv you are deluding yourself.
And Bradman was likely the most talented of all but it's hard to say without more footage.
I don't dispute that but just like there is a cap on what talent can achieve I think the same exists with training. I'm not making a firm statement on Bradman though having not paid that much attention to his gameplaySee now this just comes off as completely contrary to almost everything you’ve said in the thread. People called bats like Trumper and Jackson exceptionally talented and geniuses for their strokeplay, and in fact Bradman was expected to fail in the 1930 Ashes by many pundits due to his technique (spoiler: he didn’t). Naturally talented? Hell no, he trained his ass off. You’ve not heard the origin story of him developing his muscle memory and reflexes by hitting a golf ball with a cricket stump in his youth. Hell, even his army test showed he had worse than 20/20 vision.
Mofo included Klusener
The funny thing is he debuted in the easiest era in cricket and never played most of those.
Talent of being stupid.
He just didn't include Klusener, he included him ahead of Ntini.......Mofo included Klusener
And even went till Ambrose.... .
Batting was harder 20-25 years ago(2000-2005).
Honestly if we brought todays bat in the early to mid 90s I think they would average less.batting today is the hardest it has been since 1950s
that's bias.Honestly if we brought todays bat in the early to mid 90s I think they would average less.
It depends really, for Aus, Ind and Sa batsmen they won't. Eng, Nz, Pak etc batsmen mightHonestly if we brought todays bat in the early to mid 90s I think they would average less.
Maybe.Honestly if we brought todays bat in the early to mid 90s I think they would average less.
ODIs destroyed the technique needed to play Test Cricket and that's why 80s WI was so successful, bowling to bad batsmenMaybe.
T20 has destroyed technique needed to play in test cricket (of course there are exceptions) and that’s one of the reasons median averages is lower today.
Lol ODI cricket was only taken more seriously by the end of the decade.ODIs destroyed the technique needed to play Test Cricket and that's why 80s WI was so successful, bowling to bad batsmen