capt_Luffy
Hall of Fame Member
Less flexibleWhy not vote three pacers up front then?
Anyways I disagree.
Less flexibleWhy not vote three pacers up front then?
Anyways I disagree.
Bumrah ain't never getting ahead of McGrath.Marshall. Hadlee. Bumrah.
Future pace attack?
Because after 2 have gotten voted in, you can use that knowledge and then decide who's the best fit for the third pacerWhy not vote three pacers up front then?
Anyways I disagree.
Possibly... I'd prefer Marshall, McGrath and BumrahMarshall. Hadlee. Bumrah.
Future pace attack?
Why?Bumrah ain't never getting ahead of McGrath.
Like comeon, Hadlee over McG atleast.Possibly... I'd prefer Marshall, McGrath and Bumrah
In terms of wickets? YesBumrah ain't never getting ahead of McGrath.
There are multiple added advantages of having a spinner a variety of conditions and circumstances... When you already have 3 pacers, the 4th isn't adding as much as a spinnerWhy not just 4 pacers?
Marshall. Hadlee. McGrath. Imran.
They can win matches in any pitches.
I think he is talking about a 5 man attackThere are multiple added advantages of having a spinner a variety of conditions and circumstances... When you already have 3 pacers, the 4th isn't adding as much as a spinner
I don't consider batting that important when picking the pace attack, and to me McGrath is the greatest new ball bowler of all time, so I'd prefer himLike comeon, Hadlee over McG atleast.
I don't think soI think he is talking about a 5 man attack
That's literally like taking Sachin over Sobers for me, so disagree.I don't consider batting that important when picking the pace attack, and to me McGrath is the greatest new ball bowler of all time, so I'd prefer him
Clive Lloyd disagrees with you.When you already have 3 pacers, the 4th isn't adding as much as a spinner
Nah I'd still take McGrath over Hadlee because of height then. The other two- Marshall and Bumrah aren't exactly tall. Height sometimes really matters.Marshall. Hadlee. Bumrah.
Future pace attack?
I have a similar view ... except it's pre WWII am not comfortable with picking any pre-war cricketers with the exception of Bradman. Many may not agree but that’s just my opinion.
The over rate will be an issue.Marshall. Hadlee. Imran. Steyn.
This quartet can win matches on any pitch and are dangerous on all 5 days of the match.
If I already have 6 bowling options (better than Sobers), then I'd pick Sachin over Sobers yeahThat's literally like taking Sachin over Sobers for me, so disagree.