• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Joel Garner vs Dennis Lillee

Who is the better test bowler?


  • Total voters
    33

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I mean ok but your point was that Trueman was exceptional. He was more or less matched by Wes Hall that series and exceeded by Alan Davidson in the other series in Aus.
Alan Davidson from late 50s to early 60s is arguably the best bowler in history so. Put Steyn and He's getting outmatched too
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Another Exceptional player with exceptions was Walter Hammond, with his amazing...37 batting average in home Ashes and 42 at home against West Indies...and...and exceptional 25 average in West Indies. @Coronis won't you agree?
 
Last edited:

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Another Exceptional players with exceptions was Walter Hammond, with his amazing...37 batting average in home Ashes and 42 against home against West Indies...and...and exceptional 25 average in West Indies. @Coronis won't you agree?
I actually do agree here.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Another Exceptional players with exceptions was Walter Hammond, with his amazing...37 batting average in home Ashes and 42 at home against West Indies...and...and exceptional 25 average in West Indies. @Coronis won't you agree?
I agree, Hammond was amazing. So was Trueman.
 

Top