Gordon Greenidge vs Shivnarine Chanderpaul

[sayon basak]

and so is your existence, therefore it would be logical for you to self destruct.

At least not his face.

 

[Johan]

This comparison was made just to force @Johan to vote for one or what

I like Greenidge, I think he is Gower and Cowdrey level.

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Chanderpaul comes out very very high on my recent rating system/formula

 

[Johan]

Chanderpaul comes out very very high on my recent rating system/formula

burn the formula/system it's clearly not accurate.

 

[Thala_0710]

Chanderpaul comes out very very high on my recent rating system/formula

Send

 

[ataraxia]

Chanderpaul comes out very very high on my recent rating system/formula

What is it, the opposite of whatever Johan says?

 

[Thala_0710]

What is it, the opposite of whatever Johan says?

Would be better than most models out there

 

[Johan]

Would be better than most models out there

My model is the opposite of everything you say and it's the best model on CW so..

 

[sayon basak]

Chanderpaul comes out very very high on my recent rating system/formula

Share your rating system.

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Well it isn’t really a ranking list but more of a formula to determine if they are ATGs which it says Chanders is. All the other names for Aus/WI/SA/Eng are pretty normal though.

Chanders averaged like 58 over a 13 year stretch which is why he gets rated so high on stat based ratings but obviously that’s a bit inflated

 

[Johan]

David Gower clearly a better player than Shiv Chanderpaul

 

[sayon basak]

Well it isn’t really a ranking list but more of a formula to determine if they are ATGs which it says Chanders is. All the other names for Aus/WI/SA/Eng are pretty normal though.

Chanders averaged like 58 over a 13 year stretch which is why he gets rated so high on stat based ratings but obviously that’s a bit inflated

Share the formula.

 

[Coronis]

Well it isn’t really a ranking list but more of a formula to determine if they are ATGs which it says Chanders is. All the other names for Aus/WI/SA/Eng are pretty normal though.

Chanders averaged like 58 over a 13 year stretch which is why he gets rated so high on stat based ratings but obviously that’s a bit inflated

Why is it inflated?

 

[shortpitched713]

Flat pitch era would be my guess. But thing is, there are other obvious ATGs who batted in the era too, Chanderpaul isn't the only one effected.

Batting slow/selfish might be true to some extent, but it's also true he's on the weakest of the top 8 Test sides for almost his entire career.

 

[kyear2]

I would assume this is a joke.

Greenidge easily.

 

[Johan]

Flat pitch era would be my guess. But thing is, there are other obvious ATGs who batted in the era too, Chanderpaul isn't the only one effected.

Batting slow/selfish might be true to some extent, but it's also true he's on the weakest of the top 8 Test sides for almost his entire career.

a self imposed #5/#6 who couldn't bat with the tail, proven failiure when batting in the top four IE the new ball, the epitome of selfish batsmanship who would happily give strike to tailenders, a minnow basher and FTB on top.

Not even better than Cook.