• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Harry brook era

Tom Flint

International Regular
Pains me to say it but my best middle order batsman in the world now is travis head. Consistently changes the momentum of the his teams innings when they get off to a bad start. Seems every test I'm getting excited seeing them 40-3 hoping they lose and 30 mins later he has got them to 150. He may not go as big as the others but he gives his teams good bowlers enough to work with to often win games
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He's miles behind Hayden as a player and as a human. And as I said, Hayden isn't an all-timer in either category.

Root is a trier, and sure, by England standards he's great. But let's be honest, those standards awfully low.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Root is better than Viv Richards, a better man, a better batsman and a better leader too.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Root is definitely better than Ricky "averages 51 thanks to 2000s Aussie roads" Ponting, as far as I am concerned atleast
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Joe Root isn't fit to carry Viv Richards' jockstrap, let alone Allan Border's. If you think he's a better player than either of those blokes then you've had a significant cerebral event and should sit still so the aneurysm in your frontal lobe doesn't completely rupture while I call an ambulance for you.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Same goes for comparing him with Ponting. Just embarrassing. Root has genuinely done nothing of significance out here in three tours other than **** himself as he arrives at customs. He's a dab cutting, effete walking wicket out here and nothing he's done has changed that.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Joe Root isn't fit to carry Viv Richards' jockstrap, let alone Allan Border's. If you think he's a better player than either of those blokes then you've had a significant cerebral event and should sit still so the aneurysm in your frontal lobe doesn't completely rupture while I call an ambulance for you.
Ah, the tragic intersection of nostalgia and neurodegeneration. Fascinating, really.

You see, your passionate diatribe reads less like cricket analysis and more like a symptom profile from a BMJ case study on prefrontal cortex atrophy. The prefrontal cortex, as you may recall before it calcified, governs reason, critical thought, and—most tragically in your case—the ability to distinguish between empirical performance metrics and sentimental hallucinations.

Let’s be precise: Joe Root has more Test runs than Viv and Border, a higher average than both, and more centuries. Unlike your synapses, his numbers have not decayed with time. Richards was an icon, Border a warrior—but cricket evolves. Players now face fresh bowlers every series, play 12 months a year, and bat on green seamers in Leeds and sandpapered dustbowls in Galle with equal calm.

Calling Root inferior based on jockstrap metaphors suggests you’re emotionally wedded to a vision of cricket that stopped updating around the same time Windows XP was patched for Y2K.

So, before I call that ambulance you mentioned, do me a favour: run a CAT scan on your biases. Because the only "significant cerebral event" here is your brain’s total inability to process data from after 1995.

Now sit still—your blood pressure just spiked every time I said “Root has more runs.”
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Same goes for comparing him with Ponting. Just embarrassing. Root has genuinely done nothing of significance out here in three tours other than **** himself as he arrives at customs. He's a dab cutting, effete walking wicket out here and nothing he's done has changed that.
so if Root scores in Australia well, a century and good amount of runs, will you write an apology post for years of slander?
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ah, the tragic intersection of nostalgia and neurodegeneration. Fascinating, really.

You see, your passionate diatribe reads less like cricket analysis and more like a symptom profile from a BMJ case study on prefrontal cortex atrophy. The prefrontal cortex, as you may recall before it calcified, governs reason, critical thought, and—most tragically in your case—the ability to distinguish between empirical performance metrics and sentimental hallucinations.

Let’s be precise: Joe Root has more Test runs than Viv and Border, a higher average than both, and more centuries. Unlike your synapses, his numbers have not decayed with time. Richards was an icon, Border a warrior—but cricket evolves. Players now face fresh bowlers every series, play 12 months a year, and bat on green seamers in Leeds and sandpapered dustbowls in Galle with equal calm.

Calling Root inferior based on jockstrap metaphors suggests you’re emotionally wedded to a vision of cricket that stopped updating around the same time Windows XP was patched for Y2K.

So, before I call that ambulance you mentioned, do me a favour: run a CAT scan on your biases. Because the only "significant cerebral event" here is your brain’s total inability to process data from after 1995.

Now sit still—your blood pressure just spiked every time I said “Root has more runs.”
Hey look fellas, this ****'s got chat gpt.

Still has no idea about cricket though.

Root has failed to make a hundred in three tours to the most important and consistently the most successful rival nation he plays against. He has never won a test here.

He captained his side to all but a white wash loss when he was here last, and he still has the same technical deficiencies which have stopped him from making a big score on these shores. Namely, he opens his face with an angled bat to score behind point against quick bowlers, and the extra pace and bounce here means he nicks off consistently. It also makes him susceptible to playing on to balls which seam in and bounce, taking the inside edge of said angled bat. He was still playing those shots this innings. They work on slower wickets. He will play them again in the upcoming Ashes, and he will be a non-factor.

So don't compare that woeful record to blokes like Richards and Border who carved up across pretty much all conditions. Border averaged 55 away from home ffs across a 16 year career. There is no comparison between them.
 
Last edited:

Top