• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Scyld Berry 30 greatest test fast bowlers

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
You've also expressed similar sentiments and it made sense. Plus I've always had a gap between him and McGrath. I don't think they're equals as some do, never have.
How close is it between Hadlee and McGrath? Are they in the same tier?
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
I've also discussed Hadlee with a couple of friends who were his contemporaries (won't name names but one was a Pakistani test cricketer and the other England A) and they each believed he was the best bowler of the era. Impossible to get away, hostility and Mcgrath like accuracy. I think he's underrated because he's from NZ and not as large as life as Imran or Botham or from the larger than life Windies team.

Both Gower and Crowe rated Marshall and Lillee easily over Hadlee as bowlers, so did Viv who didn't particularly Hadlee, Holding didn't either.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Both Gower and Crowe rated Marshall and Lillee easily over Hadlee as bowlers, so did Viv who didn't particularly Hadlee, Holding didn't either.
Holding would just be salty that Hadlee is universally considered a better bowler than him.
 

peterhrt

First Class Debutant
In 2010 the book In A League Of Their Own featured 100 all-time world teams picked by ex-players plus one by umpire Dickie Bird. The various fast bowlers featured in the following number of teams:

54 - Lillee
35 - Marshall
27 - Wasim Akram
21 - Imran Khan
20 - Hadlee
18 - Botham
14 - Lindwall
13 - Miller
10 - Holding
9 - Trueman
8 - Kapil Dev, McGrath
7 - Hall
6 - Roberts
4 - Ambrose, Garner
3 - Davidson, Donald, Larwood, McKenzie
2 - Walsh
1 - Adcock, Flintoff, Shaun Pollock, Procter, Statham

Adcock picked himself.

Holding chose Hadlee, but only selected those he had played against and excluded West Indians. Otherwise he said there would be a lot of teammates and he would be accused of bias.
 
Last edited:

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Holding would just be salty that Hadlee is universally considered a better bowler than him.
He wasn't though. Not in the 80's, they weren't rated that far apart.

Holding was right in the mix with Imran and Hadlee, Hadlee was likely ahead, but it wasn't tiers apart.

Holding was rated more highly than he's rated here today
 

ankitj

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hmm I have met two of them. How about you?
guys I think are better than him and played in last 40 years would be

Sachin
Hadlee
Kallis
Steyn
Ambrose
McGrath
Marshall
Imran
Viv
Warne
arguably, Smith
Only Imran is unequivocally better than Murali IMO from that group. In fact Imran is the only one I would put ahead of Murali myself.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
He wasn't though. Not in the 80's, they weren't rated that far apart.

Holding was right in the mix with Imran and Hadlee, Hadlee was likely ahead, but it wasn't tiers apart.

Holding was rated more highly than he's rated here today
And the here today rating is actually the one I trust more, because it's less biased and more influenced by the actual currency of a bowler - getting wickets - and less about impressions. Impressions would lead one to rating Akram as being better than McGrath.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
True, spread sheets comes into it as well.
Compton went from being rated as one of the absolute greatest to ever hold a bat, to a Mahela Jayawerdene level Batsman, Statsguru gen is definitely kinder to Holding than that.
 

Top