subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hadlee made a few ATG XIs in the Lord Cricket exercise.The first tip off is that he literally never makes any all time teams.
Hadlee made a few ATG XIs in the Lord Cricket exercise.The first tip off is that he literally never makes any all time teams.
iirc there’s a few for TendulkarSend him to India or Pakistan and he'd probably get declared a deity and have places of worship for him
How close is it between Hadlee and McGrath? Are they in the same tier?You've also expressed similar sentiments and it made sense. Plus I've always had a gap between him and McGrath. I don't think they're equals as some do, never have.
I've also discussed Hadlee with a couple of friends who were his contemporaries (won't name names but one was a Pakistani test cricketer and the other England A) and they each believed he was the best bowler of the era. Impossible to get away, hostility and Mcgrath like accuracy. I think he's underrated because he's from NZ and not as large as life as Imran or Botham or from the larger than life Windies team.
Which ex cricketers did you speak to on Hadlee?Both Gower and Crowe rated Marshall and Lillee easily over Hadlee as bowlers, so did Viv who didn't particularly Hadlee, Holding didn't either.
^Wouldn't answer that without their permissions, and haven't spoken to them recently.
All I will say is that they're test cricketers.Which ex cricketers did you speak to on Hadlee?
Oh... but you will.I don’t need to hear Ashwin after his retirement thanks.
Replacing Bumrah with Hadlee would be a net positive as well, dude could bowl full series while offering a similar merit.Give my current Ind team Hadlee alongside Bumrah and we'd win everything
Holding would just be salty that Hadlee is universally considered a better bowler than him.Both Gower and Crowe rated Marshall and Lillee easily over Hadlee as bowlers, so did Viv who didn't particularly Hadlee, Holding didn't either.
Legend.Adcock picked himself.
He wasn't though. Not in the 80's, they weren't rated that far apart.Holding would just be salty that Hadlee is universally considered a better bowler than him.
Legacies always get revised after career, to be fair.Holding was rated more highly than he's rated here today
Only Imran is unequivocally better than Murali IMO from that group. In fact Imran is the only one I would put ahead of Murali myself.guys I think are better than him and played in last 40 years would be
Sachin
Hadlee
Kallis
Steyn
Ambrose
McGrath
Marshall
Imran
Viv
Warne
arguably, Smith
Maradona as well.iirc there’s a few for Tendulkar
And the here today rating is actually the one I trust more, because it's less biased and more influenced by the actual currency of a bowler - getting wickets - and less about impressions. Impressions would lead one to rating Akram as being better than McGrath.He wasn't though. Not in the 80's, they weren't rated that far apart.
Holding was right in the mix with Imran and Hadlee, Hadlee was likely ahead, but it wasn't tiers apart.
Holding was rated more highly than he's rated here today
True, spread sheets comes into it as well.Legacies always get revised after career, to be fair.
You have Murali a fair bit higher than I do, to be fair.Only Imran is unequivocally better than Murali IMO from that group. In fact Imran is the only one I would put ahead of Murali myself.
Compton went from being rated as one of the absolute greatest to ever hold a bat, to a Mahela Jayawerdene level Batsman, Statsguru gen is definitely kinder to Holding than that.True, spread sheets comes into it as well.