Johan
Hall of Fame Member
the quintessential bits and pieces player.Don't know really. Also averages 30 with the bat.
the quintessential bits and pieces player.Don't know really. Also averages 30 with the bat.
That's Daniel "better than Lillee and Trueman" Vettori you're denigrating.hand on your heart tell me Daniel "averages 40 against non minnows" Vettori is better than Michael Atherton
He truly was, but he was the epitome of itthe quintessential bits and pieces player.
I didn't know the Cartels got to Kiwiland.That's Daniel "better than Lillee and Trueman" Vettori you're denigrating.
Good effort. Comments:I'll do my top and bottom 10:-
Top 10:
1. Tendulkar
2. McGrath
3. Lara
4. Warne
5. Murali
6. Smith
7. Richards
8. Kallis
9. Akram
10. Gavaskar
Bottom 10:
1. Bairstow
2. Dimuth
3. Boucher
4. Ishant
5. Hooper
6. Strauss
7. Jayasuriya
8. Bell
9. Fleming
10. Harbhajan
Boucher was worse by that logicThe worst player to play 100 tests is Ian Healy, the specialist fielder.
He wasn't far behind Atherton with the bat! Averaged 40 for about 8 years and was a better batsman than Flintoff.hand on your heart tell me Daniel "averages 40 against non minnows" Vettori is better than Michael Atherton
Think a bit harsh on Boucher. Was a really good keep to pacers and averaged 30I'll do my top and bottom 10:-
Top 10:
1. Tendulkar
2. McGrath
3. Lara
4. Warne
5. Murali
6. Smith
7. Richards
8. Kallis
9. Akram
10. Gavaskar
Bottom 10:
1. Bairstow
2. Dimuth
3. Boucher
4. Ishant
5. Hooper
6. Strauss
7. Jayasuriya
8. Bell
9. Fleming
10. Harbhajan
Average at best.Think a bit harsh on Boucher. Was a really good keep to pacers and averaged 30
Yeah, should be about 6th or 7th (worse).Think a bit harsh on Boucher. Was a really good keep to pacers and averaged 30
He wasn't far behind Atherton with the bat! Averaged 40 for about 8 years and was a better batsman than Flintoff.
Vettori is one of only 3 players along with Kapil and Botham to have 4,000 runs and 300 wickets.
I didn't know the Cartels got to Kiwiland.
Fair enough. I myself struggle with how to properly rate Kallis but I find his bowling a bit overrated sometimes. Yes he took 300 wkts but he also has the second worst WPM of all guys with 150+ wkts iirc. His record isn't that good either upon removing the weaker opponents, especially considering he bowled on some helpful home wickets. He definitely was elite in the slips though, which is why I have him ahead of guys like Akram, Gavaskar who beat him on the primary skill comfortably.Good effort. Comments:
Kallis is way too low considering he also took almost 300 wickets and was an elite slip fielder. Otherwise, pretty good although Fleming and Harbhajan were both better than Atherton.
I think he was good to pacers but quite inept against spin. I just never rated his keeping as high as others doThink a bit harsh on Boucher. Was a really good keep to pacers and averaged 30
NoHammond is a better player than Tendulkar and Viv btw
Maybe Viv being a competent captain and an ATG fielder pulls it in his favour idk
Being a simply superior bat does. Hammond is about level with Kallis for meMaybe Viv being a competent captain and an ATG fielder pulls it in his favour idk
he is a clearly better batBeing a simply superior bat does. Hammond is about level with Kallis for me