Coronis
Hall of Fame Member
iirc wicketkeepers occasionally catchhe wasn't the problem. India lost the first test because of catching and the lower order. They also lost because English batting was brilliant.
iirc wicketkeepers occasionally catchhe wasn't the problem. India lost the first test because of catching and the lower order. They also lost because English batting was brilliant.
He hit twin tons, we don't win that test match with or without him...watch him keep, arguably, India wins the first test with a better keeper.
No issues with Risabh the bat.He hit twin tons, we don't win that test match with or without him
Eh not that simple is it. He made two tons. He was still a huge net positive despite the drops....watch him keep, arguably, India wins the first test with a better keeper.
I think you guys can play him as a bat and give the gloves to someone more reliable tbh, similar to what Sri Lanka did with Sangakkara and Prasanna JayawerdeneEh not that simple is it. He made two tons. He was still a huge net positive despite the drops.
I think our slip and outfield fielding alongside both innings collapses and two dud bowlers were significantly bigger factors...watch him keep, arguably, India wins the first test with a better keeper.
what are you talking about? Prasidh and Shardul were great, please play them the whole series, Jadeja tooI think our slip and outfield fielding alongside both innings collapses and two dud bowlers were significantly bigger factors
I would argue it's been a fair while I have heard anything close to it in stupidityIt is a stupid opinion as a matter of fact.
So he quite literally can't be a great keeper batsman.As a batsman? Yes. Maybe even better. Not greater for now. Pant is not a good keeper though.
So Headley is a greater bat than Hammond and Sutcliffe then?When a batsman thrives in a weaker team, he does so with less support and greater pressure. That makes him a greater batsman imo
Watch him.Is there any statistical measure that judges Pant as a bad keeper? I'm not seeing a higher percentage of dropped catches or byes than Gilchrist.
Basically this. Not only did he drop 2 catches, he was quite clueless when Jadeja actually started pitching the ball in the rough as well.Watch him.
Can add lack of support to Bumrah in the first innings and overly negative captaincy.he wasn't the problem. India lost the first test because of catching and the lower order. They also lost because English batting was brilliant.
Then play him as a batsman.Eh not that simple is it. He made two tons. He was still a huge net positive despite the drops.
Agreed.I think our slip and outfield fielding alongside both innings collapses and two dud bowlers were significantly bigger factors
He looked horribly out of his depth.Basically this. Not only did he drop 2 catches, he was quite clueless when Jadeja actually started pitching the ball in the rough as well.
More than willing to litigate my argument, and for the record, I'll gleefully take a Bobby Simpson as well over him.I would argue it's been a fair while I have heard anything close to it in stupidity
Ok? Not sure why you're saying this as if many Indian fans don't want Jurel to keep and Pant to play as a specialist bat.Then play him as a batsman.
This isn't complicated.
Pretty sure the last time I brought this up I was shouted down.Ok? Not sure why you're saying this as if many Indian fans don't want Jurel to keep and Pant to play as a specialist bat.