Thala_0710
International Captain
Well well wellhe won't have to, Crawley would make 200 on this.
Well well wellhe won't have to, Crawley would make 200 on this.
ah ****Well well well
Tbf, I don't think anyone could have played thatah ****
Bumrah is ridiculous.Tbf, I don't think anyone could have played that
My vote goes to Brearley because of what I've read about him and his record. Jardine was captain for 15 tests and most of his reputation is based on 5 of them. Hutton was known as a defensive captain, with the only ruthless streak being his selection policies, which could be looked at as sometimes misguided.Impacting the team's morale is, in my opinion, pretty important.
Like, if you look at the last BGT, the Indian team had completely different approach to the game and a way different demeanor under Bumrah and Kohli, while they had a lazy and lousy demeanor under Rohit, who was a very inept Captain as we saw.
You can see this with the England team too, during Root's reign, very often the team hid in a shell and didn't take the initiative, but with Stokes they squeeze almost all of their talent and that has led to far better results for England.
I think Hutton, Jardine and Brearley are all tactically brilliant captains and would get picked for their abilities as tacticians themselves (Hutton for 1954 Ashes, and Brearley in general) but I think the prior two simply had much profound impact on Cricket itself and brought a killer instinct and ruthless to the English team that England lacks to this day, so I would generally favour the prior two
Yeah.....Well well well
Hutton was very ruthless, I remember reading about him intentionally asking his bowlers to take more time to complete his over to take away a win from Australia, a game they had rightfully won. Also wanted to take a 5 paceman attack to Australia decades before that idea was common, as well as promoted short pitched leg theory by Tyson in a no helmet era. He was defensive in batting and asked his bats to be defensive (except Denis as he did whatever he wanted) because he thought English batting was weak in early 50s with Compton's knee explosion.My vote goes to Brearley because of what I've read about him and his record. Jardine was captain for 15 tests and most of his reputation is based on 5 of them. Hutton was known as a defensive captain, with the only ruthless streak being his selection policies, which could be looked at as sometimes misguided.
I could.Tbf, I don't think anyone could have played that
We would have a better chance tbh. Wouldn't see the ball and likely just miss itI could.
Even the first example was defensive and non sporting, not cut throat.Hutton was very ruthless, I remember reading about him intentionally asking his bowlers to take more time to complete his over to take away a win from Australia, a game they had rightfully won. Also wanted to take a 5 paceman attack to Australia decades before that idea was common, as well as promoted short pitched leg theory by Tyson in a no helmet era. He was defensive in batting and asked his bats to be defensive (except Denis as he did whatever he wanted) because he thought English batting was weak in early 50s with Compton's knee explosion.
Every Aussie captain would do that, but Stokes would not in the name of Cricketing spirit and lose the game, the tactic isn't really aggressive but it's very much ruthless and a willingness to punch under the belt that you'd not generally see with English Captains.Even the first example was defensive and non sporting, not cut throat.
Leg theory was also not new and everyone with capable pace-men used it.
What I would say to the likes of @Coronis and others who maintain that strike rate doesn't matter should look at some of the fields that were set in the session just now.We would have a better chance tbh. Wouldn't see the ball and likely just miss it
To be fair, we'd be saying the exact reverse if Jadeja had caught Duckett.What I would say to the likes of @Coronis and others who maintain that strike rate doesn't matter should look at some of the fields that were set in the session just now.
It most definitely does, it doesn't have to be from everyone and must be used judiciously, but the impact is real.
If luck was even partially in his favour, England would be atleast 3 down nowTo be fair, we'd be saying the exact reverse if Jadeja had caught Duckett.
tbf Luck was in favour by the clouds gathering when he got the new ball when it was sunny and hot for 4 sessions prior.If luck was even partially in his favour, England would be atleast 3 down now
Won't deny but feel even without the clouds the result won't be too dissimilar. It hardly looked to have any effect in the way our other bowlers bowled.tbf Luck was in favour by the clouds gathering when he got the new ball when it was sunny and hot for 4 sessions prior.
and another one dropped off Pope...Won't deny but feel even without the clouds the result won't be too dissimilar. It hardly looked to have any effect in the way our other bowlers bowled.
Had to leave home, how?and another one dropped off Pope...