• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Rabada vs Roberts vs Anderson

Better bowler in tests?


  • Total voters
    34

ma1978

International Debutant
Nah, KG is amped by having the most pacer friendly pitches ever at home, play him and Donald a hundred games together and they won't be much close.
no, Rabada has been as good as Donald in England (against much better teams) and better in Aus. His only weakness is the subcontinent and Donald beat up some weak ass Indian teams. Donald tended to go missing when it matters. And Anderson is a huge gap in class.
 

Johan

International Coach
no, Rabada has been as good as Donald in England (against much better teams) and better in Aus. His only weakness is the subcontinent and Donald beat up some weak ass Indian teams. Donald tended to go missing when it matters. And Anderson is a huge gap in class.
Rabada had one good series in Australia but he was so bad in his second series he probably deserved to average north of 50 but got some useless wickets to get it down. Rabada averages 26 against England in England, not close to Donald and Donald beat the lineup of Dravid, Tendulkar, Azhar and Laxman in India.

Anderson vs Rabada much more debateable, Anderson far superior in Asia while Rabada is better in Australia.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
no, Rabada has been as good as Donald in England (against much better teams) and better in Aus. His only weakness is the subcontinent and Donald beat up some weak ass Indian teams. Donald tended to go missing when it matters. And Anderson is a huge gap in class.
Not sure England's batting lineups in 2017 & 2022 were necessarily much better v pace than 1994 & 1998. I'd certainly say Donald bowled to better batting lineups in Australia and Rabada was disappointing on his second tour there.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
Rabada had one good series in Australia but he was so bad in his second series he probably deserved to average north of 50 but got some useless wickets to get it down. Rabada averages 26 against England in England, not close to Donald and Donald beat the lineup of Dravid, Tendulkar, Azhar and Laxman in India.

Anderson vs Rabada much more debateable, Anderson far superior in Asia while Rabada is better in Australia.
Australia more important for an English player than Asia is for a Saffer
 

Johan

International Coach
Australia more important for an English player than Asia is for a Saffer
Anderson was one of the key components in winning a series in Australia on some really flat pitches since 1986 so not really sure he hasn't checked that key
 

MasterBlaster24

U19 Debutant
Rabada will most likely end his career as the best bowler out of these three, but for now, I'm picking Jimmy. I'd just like to see Rabada have a great series in Asia before giving him the edge.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Both, Anderson specially. I thought he was rated higher than Anderson at least.
Its a more recent thing, but has become the majority opinion recently.

We have this comparison, and in the 2024 bowler poll Anderson ranked 25th and Roberts 28th (20th and 21st amongst pacers). In the 2022 pace bowler poll Roberts was 18th and Anderson 19th (this one excluded Barnes, in the 2024 poll Cummins was ahead of both in 23rd, Rabada was 29th and Bumrah was equal 30th)
 

Top