That is so silly.also, I said "critics" as in both Holding and Lillee have questioned Sunny's ability on fast pitches,
Holding thought he was a fairweather batter, safe to say he didn't rate him.That is so silly.
Sunny scored 5 centuries against him.
Ambrose is still a 5 test series, can't be ignored as a sample. Still bottomline good otherwise please ignore all of Sobers great series at home.against those bowlers
Steyn (56)
McGrath (42)
Shoaib (41)
Pollock (39)
Donald (32)
2 Ws (30)
fast bowlers, Ambrose I represented my problem with earlier. Overall his output against great bowlers is decent but not too dissimilar to the output that Lara had against most of the crew, and that was my point that in one way or another, the output against top level attacks is similar.
70 Eng more and it was Gavaskar's 3rd Series overall."Unofficial" Tests, and you've agreed the 1970 England series and 71 Australia is directly translateable to Tests.
He played 5 games against the Ws aged 16 and in context his record to McGrath is quite Greatagainst those bowlers
Steyn (56)
McGrath (42)
Shoaib (41)
Pollock (39)
Donald (32)
2 Ws (30)
fast bowlers, Ambrose I represented my problem with earlier. Overall his output against great bowlers is decent but not too dissimilar to the output that Lara had against most of the crew, and that was my point that in one way or another, the output against top level attacks is similar.
Which btw, you also agreed was a bit silly assessment.Holding thought he was a fairweather batter, safe to say he didn't rate him.
That's alright, It was Lillee's second.70 Eng more and it was Gavaskar's 3rd Series overall.
I only took late 90s-early 2000s variant, You really think you can catch me slacking?He played 5 games against the Ws aged 16 and in context his record to McGrath is quite Great
It's really strange seeing nitpicks like this because Tendulkar legit played those bowlers very well and his 99 and 2001 series helped to cement his reputation and now it's being called decent.He played 5 games against the Ws aged 16 and in context his record to McGrath is quite Great
Also played a legit top tier ATG innings in one of the other 2 matches...... Only Donald among these is a fair criticism and that too he had a very Good ton in each of his 3 match SA toursIt's really strange seeing nitpicks like this because Tendulkar legit played those bowlers very well and his 99 and 2001 series helped to cement his reputation and now it's being called decent.
Not to mention a very class 97 scored in the 2000 series at home.Also played a legit top tier ATG innings in one of the other 2 matches...... Only Donald among these is a fair criticism and that too he had a very Good ton in each of his 3 match SA tours
compared to some of the other ATG bats for reference, Here is Rootagainst those bowlers
Steyn (56)
McGrath (42)
Shoaib (41)
Pollock (39)
Donald (32)
2 Ws (30)
fast bowlers, Ambrose I represented my problem with earlier. Overall his output against great bowlers is decent but not too dissimilar to the output that Lara had against most of the crew, and that was my point that in one way or another, the output against top level attacks is similar.
Then isn't that average over 2 matches even Worse representation of the true story?That's alright, It was Lillee's second.
I only took late 90s-early 2000s variant, You really think you can catch me slacking?
The only motif behind these stats is to make Root look better than Smith vs ATG bowlers......compared to some of the other ATG bats for reference, Here is Root
Bumrah (57)
Rabada (45)
Cummins (39) [.73]
Hazlewood (50)
Philander (52)
for Smith
Rabada (39)
Bumrah (38)
Philander (41)
Anderson (53)
Steyn (50)
it's over 6 innings, and that was my point, He made his runs as followsThen isn't that average over 2 matches even Worse representation of the true story?
And yeah, it was Lillee's 2nd and he did Good. Bravo.
3 matches and a legit top 50 innings. Will take it over two pretty tons of 3 50s/5 40s of no quality.it's over 6 innings, and that was my point, He made his runs as follows
0
136
6
29
0
9
same thing as the Donald games, a few diamonds, and tons of rocks.
Both things can be true simultaneously.3 matches and a legit top 50 innings. Will take it over two pretty tons of 3 50s/5 40s of no quality.
Then Holding is an idiot.Holding thought he was a fairweather batter, safe to say he didn't rate him.
Can be. But there's one I will rate significantly higher than the other.Both things can be true simultaneously.