• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Virat Kohli vs Clyde Walcott

Who is the better test batsman?

  • Total voters
    20
DrWolverine

DrWolverine

International Captain
Clyde Walcott averages 14 in Australia(3 Tests) & 34 in England(9 Tests). He has a great record at home and against India & NewZealand.
 
Johan

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
DrWolverine said:
Clyde Walcott averages 14 in Australia(3 Tests) & 34 in England(9 Tests). He has a great record at home and against India & NewZealand.
Click to expand...
there's context, he was injured in Australia and Australia used bodyline tactics on him when he suffered a displaced disc in his spinal column, and in England he has an ATG knock, his average in England is actually higher than Virat"s
 
Last edited:
ankitj

ankitj

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Think Kohli should remain ahead of other batters with similar averages or even slightly higher because he got a lot of difficult runs during his 5-6 year peak.
 
Johan

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I mean...Walcott made 5 hundreds in one series against Lindwall/Archer/Miller/Johnston/Johnson/Benaud and pushed a couple into retirement train. That's both pretty tough and pretty crazy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top