• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sunil Gavaskar vs Rahul Dravid

Who is the better test batsman?


  • Total voters
    22

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
If you are talking about the Carribean accent, then yes. Not sure if that's racist or just cringe. Else, tough to say really.
Nah, he literally called a West Indian
crowd "uncivilized barbarians" who "shrieked and howled" and "belonged to the jungles" in his autobiography. Don't know that he ever apologized for it either.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Nah, he literally called a West Indian
crowd "uncivilized barbarians" who "shrieked and howled" and "belonged to the jungles" in his autobiography. Don't know that he ever apologized for it either.
Yeah, I read that part and found it very distasteful and opinionated, but not sure if it's racist. Like, that Kensington match crowd was quite wild so don't really know. It wasn't even he worst feud with a particular crowd, that happened in Kolkata.
 

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah, I read that part and found it very distasteful and opinionated, but not sure if it's racist. Like, that Kensington match crowd was quite wild so don't really know. It wasn't even he worst feud with a particular crowd, that happened in Kolkata.
He didn't use blatantly racist language to refer to a Kolkata crowd, as far as I'm aware.

That's what makes the fact that he did, in reference to the Kensington crowd, racist, imo.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
He didn't use blatantly racist language to refer to a Kolkata crowd, as far as I'm aware.

That's what makes the fact that he did, in reference to the Kensington crowd, racist, imo.
Again, the issue is sensitive, but I don't think the language used was racist per say. Distasteful, definitely. Racist, not sure. Calling a crowd uncivilized is not necessarily racist imo, but very well could had been. Anyways, not really interested in defending Gavaskar on this matter.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah, I read that part and found it very distasteful and opinionated, but not sure if it's racist. Like, that Kensington match crowd was quite wild so don't really know. It wasn't even he worst feud with a particular crowd, that happened in Kolkata.
Ok, second time mentioning this......

Are you serious? Are you legitimately being serious right now? Not racist?
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Ok, second time mentioning this......

Are you serious? Are you legitimately being serious right now? Not racist?
Again, I seriously don't know if those comments had any racist connotation or were just a man rumbling very distasteful rubbish about a crowd he didn't liked.
 

Arachnodouche

International Captain
Indians call each other monkeys too when they're exhibiting uncouth behavior. Where Gavaskar was ignorant and stupid was translating a harmless Indian colloquialism wholesale to the English language where it becomes loaded with meaning and historical context. Has he ever offered an apology for his words?
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Indians call each other monkeys too when they're exhibiting uncouth behavior. Where Gavaskar was ignorant and stupid was translating a harmless Indian colloquialism wholesale to the English language where it becomes loaded with meaning and historical context.
Significant historical context for a player who spent significant time in England?
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Indians call each other monkeys too when they're exhibiting uncouth behavior. Where Gavaskar was ignorant and stupid was translating a harmless Indian colloquialism wholesale to the English language where it becomes loaded with meaning and historical context. Has he ever offered an apology for his words?
To big a prick to apologize
Significant historical context for a player who spent significant time in England?
Significant context, but we Indians aren't whites and really have no reason to consider to not be on the same ground as blacks. We were the oppressed, not the oppressors.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
To big a prick to apologize

Significant context, but we Indians aren't whites and really have no reason to consider to not be on the same ground as blacks. We were the oppressed, not the oppressors.
Meh a lot of nuance in there and I wouldn’t say it’s that simple. Indians were often treated very differently than African populations in western context. That’s of course not taking into account history of India itself, where the people oppressor/oppressed narration kind of falls apart given all our history - especially if you take all Indians and group them into one and ignore all caste and other distinctions (which would be a nonsensical thing to do).

Gavaskar should have known better, given his education and background, especially in the context of how Africans are treated in India and by Indians in general - plus he has his own baggage from how he was treated in England - so I don't find any excuses credible.
 
Last edited:

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Meh a lot of nuance in there and I wouldn’t say it’s that simple. Indians were often treated very differently than African populations in western context. That’s of course not taking into account history of India itself, where the people oppressor/oppressed narration kind of falls apart given all our history - especially if you take all Indians and group them into one and ignore all caste and other distinctions (which would be a nonsensical thing to do).

Gavaskar should have known better, given his education and background, especially in the context of how Africans are treated in India and by Indians in general - plus he has his own baggage from how he was treated in England - so I don't find any excuses credible.
Thank you.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Meh a lot of nuance in there and I wouldn’t say it’s that simple. Indians were often treated very differently than African populations in western context. That’s of course not taking into account history of India itself, where the people oppressor/oppressed narration kind of falls apart given all our history - especially if you take all Indians and group them into one and ignore all caste and other distinctions (which would be a nonsensical thing to do).

Gavaskar should have known better, given his education and background, especially in the context of how Africans are treated in India and by Indians in general - plus he has his own baggage from how he was treated in England - so I don't find any excuses credible.
Yeah, let's leave it at that. Too nuanced an issue and it would had taken him nothing to apologize at least.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
It's not a nuanced issue there, and an apology wasn't issued because he didn't see one as warranted and he's been allowed to start a new career despite his being a racist piece of ****.

But I'll end this here.
Again, I apologize if my stance anyhow offended you; and I can definitely see how I would have not been much keen had such comments made by a white person about an Indian crowd. But here, saying a crowd belongs in jungle isn't really much uncommon. Distasteful, very much. I personally viewed the comment as something akin to Tony Greig's "grovel", a comment made my a commenter not exactly on derogatory terms, but with an ignorance towards it's reception. I am never going to defend that comment (as frankly, that's not very defendable) as nothing but uncultured. But I probably lacked the POV required to see it in the bigger picture. Again, I am sorry.
 

Top